Brian Worrell - Baker Hughes Chief Financial Officer
| BKR Stock | USD 43.95 0.34 0.78% |
CFO
Brian Worrell is Chief Financial Officer of Baker Hughes Co since 2017.
| Age | 48 |
| Tenure | 7 years |
| Address | 575 North Dairy Ashford Road, Houston, TX, United States, 77079-1121 |
| Phone | 713 439 8600 |
| Web | https://www.bakerhughes.com |
Baker Hughes Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0543 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0543 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.1429 %, implying that it generated $0.1429 on every 100 dollars invested. Baker Hughes' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Baker Hughes manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 12/01/2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to grow to 0.08. Also, Return On Capital Employed is likely to grow to 0.10. At this time, Baker Hughes' Return On Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year.Similar Executives
| Found 10 records | CFO Age | ||
| Alicia Mondolo | Tenaris SA ADR | 65 | |
| Christopher Weber | Valaris | 51 | |
| Alan CPA | Oceaneering International | 58 | |
| Mark CPA | Now Inc | 42 | |
| Ben Palmer | RPC Inc | 64 | |
| Michael CPA | RPC Inc | 51 | |
| Quinn Fanning | Expro Group Holdings | 60 | |
| Arunava Mitra | Weatherford International PLC | ||
| Jay Nutt | Cactus Inc | 61 | |
| Samuel CPA | Tidewater | 64 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.14 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0543 |
Baker Hughes Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Baker Hughes' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Baker Hughes inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Baker. The board's role is to monitor Baker Hughes' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Baker Hughes' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Baker Hughes' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Regina Jones, Chief Legal Officer | ||
| Neeraj Sethi, Director OFS | ||
| Greg Brenneman, Independent Director | ||
| Clarence Cazalot, Independent Director | ||
| Lynn Elsenhans, Independent Director | ||
| Nancy CPA, Chief Officer | ||
| Brian Worrell, Chief Financial Officer | ||
| James Apostolides, Senior Excellence | ||
| Lorenzo Simonelli, Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer | ||
| Muzzamil Ahmed, Chief Officer | ||
| Maria Borras, President and Chief Executive Officer, Oilfield Services | ||
| Gregory Brenneman, Independent Director | ||
| Chris Barkey, Chief Technology | ||
| Neil Saunders, President and Chief Executive Officer of Oilfield Equipment | ||
| Uwemedimo Ukpong, Executive Vice President - Regions, Alliances & Enterprise Sales | ||
| W Beattie, Lead Independent Director | ||
| Nelda Connors, Independent Director | ||
| Cynthia Carroll, Independent Director | ||
| Judson CFA, VP Relations | ||
| Chase Mulvehill, Vice Relations | ||
| William Marsh, Chief Legal Officer | ||
| Jim Apostolides, Senior Excellence | ||
| Ganesh Ramaswamy, Executive Technology | ||
| Gregory Ebel, Independent Director | ||
| John Rice, Director | ||
| Jeff Fleece, Chief Officer | ||
| Derek Mathieson, Chief Marketing and Technology Officer | ||
| Georgia Magno, Chief Officer | ||
| Lee Whitley, Associate VP | ||
| Fernando Contreras, Vice Secretary | ||
| Rebecca Charlton, Controller VP | ||
| Michele Fiorentino, Executive Vice President Strategy & Business Development | ||
| Kurt Camilleri, Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer, Controller | ||
| Rami Qasem, Executive Vice President - Digital Solutions | ||
| Deanna Jones, Communications People | ||
| Roderick Christie, Executive Vice President - Turbomachinery and Process Solutions |
Baker Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Baker Hughes a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.14 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0543 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.08 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.13 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 46.86 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 989.53 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 0.12 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 98.04 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 16.29 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 158.33 X |
Pair Trading with Baker Hughes
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Baker Hughes position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Baker Hughes will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Baker Stock
Moving against Baker Stock
| 0.8 | TDW | Tidewater | PairCorr |
| 0.74 | XPRO | Expro Group Holdings | PairCorr |
| 0.54 | DTI | Drilling Tools Inter | PairCorr |
| 0.4 | WFRD | Weatherford International | PairCorr |
| 0.32 | ENSV | Enservco | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Baker Hughes could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Baker Hughes when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Baker Hughes - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Baker Hughes Co to buy it.
The correlation of Baker Hughes is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Baker Hughes moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Baker Hughes moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Baker Hughes can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Baker Stock Analysis
When running Baker Hughes' price analysis, check to measure Baker Hughes' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Baker Hughes is operating at the current time. Most of Baker Hughes' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Baker Hughes' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Baker Hughes' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Baker Hughes to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.