Barrett Brady - EPR Properties Independent Trustee
EPR Stock | USD 45.78 0.53 1.17% |
Executive
Mr. Barrett Brady is Independent Trustee of EPR Properties. Mr. Brady retired December 31, 2008 from his position as Senior Vice President of Highwoods Properties, Inc., a NYSElisted real estate investment trust. Mr. Brady served as President and Chief Executive Officer of J.C. Nichols Company, a real estate company headquartered in Kansas City, Missouri, until its acquisition in 1998 by Highwoods Properties, Inc. Before joining J.C. Nichols Company in 1995, Mr. Brady was President and Chief Executive Officer of Dunn Industries, Inc., a major construction contractor. Mr. Brady serves on the board of directors, the audit and executive committees, and is chairman of the ESOP of J.E. Dunn Construction Group, Inc. He also serves on the board of directors, the compensation and nominating committees and is chairman of the audit committee of NASB Financial, Inc., a thrift holding company of North American Savings Bank, F.S.B., and he serves on the board of directors and is chairman of the audit committee of North American Savings Bank, F.S.B. He also serves on the board of directors and the audit and corporate governance committees of CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc., a NYSElisted owner of U.S. energy infrastructure assets. Mr. Brady also serves on the board of directors and compensation committee of MRIGlobal since 2004.
Age | 73 |
Tenure | 20 years |
Professional Marks | MBA |
Address | 909 Walnut Street, Kansas City, MO, United States, 64106-2003 |
Phone | 816 472 1700 |
Web | https://www.eprkc.com |
EPR Properties Management Efficiency
The company has Return on Asset of 0.0382 % which means that on every $100 spent on assets, it made $0.0382 of profit. This is way below average. In the same way, it shows a return on shareholders' equity (ROE) of 0.0818 %, implying that it generated $0.0818 on every 100 dollars invested. EPR Properties' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well EPR Properties manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, EPR Properties' Return On Tangible Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/29/2024, Return On Assets is likely to grow to 0.04, while Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop 0.04. At this time, EPR Properties' Non Currrent Assets Other are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/29/2024, Total Current Assets is likely to grow to about 760.3 M, while Non Current Assets Total are likely to drop slightly above 2.6 B.Similar Executives
Showing other executives | EXECUTIVE Age | ||
Carole Meixsell | Iron Mountain Incorporated | N/A | |
Paul Reddick | Crown Castle | N/A | |
Peter Olson | Digital Realty Trust | N/A | |
Edward Diver | Digital Realty Trust | N/A | |
Brandi Morandi | Equinix | 51 | |
Karen Rohrkemper | Crown Castle | N/A | |
Eugene Noel | American Tower Corp | 55 | |
CPA CFA | Hannon Armstrong Sustainable | 46 | |
Ellen Hall | Iron Mountain Incorporated | N/A | |
Steven JD | American Tower Corp | 53 | |
Greg Lever | Iron Mountain Incorporated | N/A | |
Mark CFA | SBA Communications Corp | N/A | |
Daniel CFA | Hannon Armstrong Sustainable | 52 | |
Adam Berlew | Equinix | 57 | |
Susan CFA | Hannon Armstrong Sustainable | 63 | |
Lawrence Harris | SBA Communications Corp | 55 | |
Adam Smith | American Tower Corp | N/A | |
Brandi JD | Equinix | 51 | |
Anthony Noble | American Tower Corp | N/A | |
Gregory Wright | Digital Realty Trust | 59 | |
Cindy Fiedelman | Digital Realty Trust | 57 |
Management Performance
Return On Equity | 0.0818 | |||
Return On Asset | 0.0382 |
EPR Properties Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the EPR Properties' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: EPR Properties inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of EPR. The board's role is to monitor EPR Properties' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. EPR Properties' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, EPR Properties' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
Gregory Zimmerman, Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer | ||
Mark Peterson, Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President, Treasurer | ||
April Jenkins, VP Controller | ||
Gwendolyn Johnson, Senior Management | ||
Paul Turvey, Senior Counsel | ||
Robin Sterneck, Independent Trustee | ||
Gregory Silvers, President, Chief Executive Officer, Trustee | ||
Virginia Shanks, Independent Trustee | ||
Morgan II, Executive Advisor | ||
Brian Moriarty, Senior Communications | ||
Michael Hirons, Senior Vice President - Strategy and Asset Management | ||
Robert Druten, Independent Chairman of the Board of Trustee | ||
Peter Brown, Independent Trustee | ||
JD Esq, General VP | ||
Gregory JD, Executive Officer | ||
Tonya CPA, Senior Officer | ||
Lisa Trimberger, Independent Trustee | ||
Elizabeth Grace, Senior Administration | ||
Thomas Bloch, Independent Trustee | ||
James Connor, Independent Trustee | ||
Tonya Mater, Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer | ||
Mark CPA, CFO VP | ||
Jack Newman, Independent Trustee | ||
Barrett Brady, Independent Trustee | ||
Craig Evans, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, Secretary | ||
Derek Werner, Vice Analysis | ||
Caixia Ziegler, Independent Trustee |
EPR Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is EPR Properties a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
Return On Equity | 0.0818 | |||
Return On Asset | 0.0382 | |||
Profit Margin | 0.29 % | |||
Operating Margin | 0.53 % | |||
Current Valuation | 6.5 B | |||
Shares Outstanding | 75.73 M | |||
Shares Owned By Insiders | 2.13 % | |||
Shares Owned By Institutions | 72.85 % | |||
Number Of Shares Shorted | 2.46 M | |||
Price To Earning | 20.44 X |
Pair Trading with EPR Properties
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if EPR Properties position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in EPR Properties will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with EPR Stock
Moving against EPR Stock
0.67 | UE | Urban Edge Properties | PairCorr |
0.63 | WELL | Welltower | PairCorr |
0.57 | AKR | Acadia Realty Trust | PairCorr |
0.45 | EQIX | Equinix | PairCorr |
0.36 | AHR | American Healthcare REIT, | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to EPR Properties could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace EPR Properties when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back EPR Properties - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling EPR Properties to buy it.
The correlation of EPR Properties is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as EPR Properties moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if EPR Properties moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for EPR Properties can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for EPR Stock Analysis
When running EPR Properties' price analysis, check to measure EPR Properties' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy EPR Properties is operating at the current time. Most of EPR Properties' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of EPR Properties' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move EPR Properties' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of EPR Properties to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.