Scott Martin - NET Power Chief Officer
| NPWR Stock | 10.52 0.18 1.68% |
Executive
Scott Martin is Chief Officer of NET Power
| Address | 320 Roney Street, Durham, NC, United States, 27701 |
| Phone | 919 287 4750 |
| Web | https://www.netpower.com |
NET Power Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (0.0374) % which means that it has lost $0.0374 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of (0.0393) %, meaning that it created substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. NET Power's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well NET Power manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of 12/11/2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to -0.11. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to -0.06. At this time, NET Power's Total Assets are relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 12/11/2024, Net Tangible Assets is likely to grow to about 61.2 M, though Non Currrent Assets Other are likely to grow to (2.1 M).Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | EXECUTIVE Age | ||
| Kerry JD | Datadog | 43 | |
| Eliot Caroom | FactSet Research Systems | N/A | |
| Ricardo Yanez | Grupo Televisa SAB | 51 | |
| Christopher McLoughlin | FactSet Research Systems | N/A | |
| Sara Varni | Datadog | N/A | |
| Sean Alford | Ziff Davis | N/A | |
| Brian Daly | FactSet Research Systems | 53 | |
| Yanbing Li | Datadog | 53 | |
| Alan Steier | Ziff Davis | N/A | |
| Martin Cossette | BCE Inc | N/A | |
| Juan Newman | Grupo Televisa SAB | N/A | |
| Vinay Kapoor | FactSet Research Systems | N/A | |
| Christopher Ellis | FactSet Research Systems | 52 | |
| Yasmine Rodriguez | Asure Software | N/A | |
| Rodrigo Villanueva | Grupo Televisa SAB | N/A | |
| Juan Aguilar | Grupo Televisa SAB | N/A | |
| Yanghua Yang | WiMi Hologram Cloud | 35 | |
| Peter Bannon | Tesla Inc | N/A | |
| MD MA | Ziff Davis | 64 | |
| Patrick McKillop | Asure Software | N/A | |
| Lori Tansley | Ziff Davis | 53 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | -0.0393 | |||
| Return On Asset | -0.0374 |
NET Power Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the NET Power's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: NET Power inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of NET. The board's role is to monitor NET Power's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. NET Power's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, NET Power's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Xijia Lu, Chief Officer | ||
| Daniel IV, CEO Director | ||
| Mark Lennon, Chief Officer | ||
| Bryce Mendes, Director Relations | ||
| Amy Keyser, Chief Officer | ||
| Akash Patel, Chief Officer | ||
| Jessica Jones, VP Controller | ||
| Scott Martin, Chief Officer | ||
| James Mahon, General Counsel | ||
| Brian Allen, President COO | ||
| Jill Cartwright, Vice Relations | ||
| Kelly Rosser, Chief Officer |
NET Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is NET Power a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | -0.0393 | |||
| Return On Asset | -0.0374 | |||
| Operating Margin | (188.46) % | |||
| Current Valuation | 249.2 M | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 73.19 M | |||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 13.45 % | |||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 87.37 % | |||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 2.78 M | |||
| Price To Book | 1.05 X | |||
| Price To Sales | 3,221 X |
Pair Trading with NET Power
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if NET Power position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in NET Power will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with NET Stock
Moving against NET Stock
| 0.93 | CYD | China Yuchai Interna | PairCorr |
| 0.81 | AOS | Smith AO | PairCorr |
| 0.62 | MKDWW | MKDWELL Tech Warrants | PairCorr |
| 0.51 | RR | Richtech Robotics Class | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to NET Power could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace NET Power when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back NET Power - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling NET Power to buy it.
The correlation of NET Power is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as NET Power moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if NET Power moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for NET Power can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for NET Stock Analysis
When running NET Power's price analysis, check to measure NET Power's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy NET Power is operating at the current time. Most of NET Power's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of NET Power's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move NET Power's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of NET Power to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.