Jeff Housman - Restaurant Brands Chief Inc
| QSP-UN Stock | CAD 98.08 2.14 2.14% |
Insider
Jeff Housman is Chief Inc of Restaurant Brands International
| Age | 42 |
| Address | 130 King Street West, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5X 1E1 |
| Phone | 905 339 6011 |
| Web | https://www.rbi.com |
Restaurant Brands Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0586 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0586 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.3731 %, meaning that it generated $0.3731 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Restaurant Brands' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Restaurant Brands manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of December 11, 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is expected to decline to 0.10. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is expected to decline to 0.07. The current year's Non Currrent Assets Other is expected to grow to about 1.3 B, whereas Total Assets are forecasted to decline to about 20.7 B.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | INSIDER Age | ||
| Martin Viecha | Tesla Inc CDR | N/A | |
| Jeffrey Williams | Apple Inc CDR | 60 | |
| Frank Shaw | Microsoft Corp CDR | N/A | |
| Christopher Capossela | Microsoft Corp CDR | 54 | |
| Sundar Pichai | Alphabet Inc CDR | 51 | |
| Nancy Paxton | Apple Inc CDR | N/A | |
| Fiona Cicconi | Alphabet Inc CDR | 58 | |
| Amie OToole | Alphabet Inc CDR | 49 | |
| Franz Holzhausen | Tesla Inc CDR | N/A | |
| Werner Vogels | Amazon CDR | N/A | |
| Dave Fildes | Amazon CDR | N/A | |
| Keith Esq | Microsoft Corp CDR | N/A | |
| Zachary Kirkhorn | Tesla Inc CDR | 39 | |
| Shelley Reynolds | Amazon CDR | 59 | |
| Alan Prescott | Tesla Inc CDR | 45 | |
| Anuradha Aggarwal | Amazon CDR | N/A | |
| Luca Maestri | Apple Inc CDR | 61 | |
| James Wilson | Apple Inc CDR | N/A | |
| Larry Page | Alphabet Inc CDR | 51 | |
| Satya Nadella | Microsoft Corp CDR | 57 | |
| Timothy Cook | Apple Inc CDR | 63 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.37 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0586 |
Restaurant Brands Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Restaurant Brands' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Restaurant Brands inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Restaurant. The board's role is to monitor Restaurant Brands' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Restaurant Brands' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Restaurant Brands' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Fernando Machado, Chief Inc | ||
| Jeff Housman, Chief Inc | ||
| Matthew Dunnigan, Chief Inc | ||
| Axel Schwan, President Inc | ||
| Patrick Doyle, Executive Inc | ||
| Joshua Kobza, Chief Inc | ||
| Jill Granat, General Inc | ||
| David Shear, President Inc | ||
| Duncan Fulton, Chief Inc | ||
| Thomas Curtis, President Inc | ||
| Sami Siddiqui, President Inc | ||
| Jacqueline Friesner, Chief Inc | ||
| Jose Cil, Chief Inc |
Restaurant Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Restaurant Brands a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.The ability to find closely correlated positions to Restaurant Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Restaurant Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Restaurant Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Restaurant Brands International to buy it.
The correlation of Restaurant Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Restaurant Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Restaurant Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Restaurant Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Restaurant Brands International. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in employment. You can also try the Balance Of Power module to check stock momentum by analyzing Balance Of Power indicator and other technical ratios.