Marisa Fabiano - Rogers Communications Chief Officer
| RCI-A Stock | CAD 53.50 1.40 2.55% |
Executive
Marisa Fabiano is Chief Officer of Rogers Communications
| Address | 333 Bloor Street East, Toronto, ON, Canada, M4W 1G9 |
| Phone | 416-935-7777 |
| Web | https://www.rogers.com |
Rogers Communications Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0424 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0424 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.1353 %, meaning that it generated $0.1353 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Rogers Communications' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Rogers Communications manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to -0.8 in 2024. Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to -0.98 in 2024. Total Current Liabilities is likely to gain to about 9.2 B in 2024. Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is likely to gain to about 72.7 B in 2024Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | EXECUTIVE Age | ||
| Mark JD | Broadcom | 56 | |
| Andrew Baglino | Tesla Inc CDR | 43 | |
| Jill Turner | Broadcom | N/A | |
| Douglas Herrington | Amazon CDR | 57 | |
| Christopher Cox | Meta Platforms CDR | 41 | |
| Peter Bannon | Tesla Inc CDR | N/A | |
| Ed Redmond | Broadcom | N/A | |
| Frank Ostojic | Broadcom | N/A | |
| Henry Moniz | Meta Platforms CDR | 59 | |
| Robert Sherbin | NVIDIA CDR | 65 | |
| Andrew Bosworth | Meta Platforms CDR | 42 | |
| Prabhakar Raghavan | Alphabet Inc CDR | 63 | |
| Susan Li | Meta Platforms CDR | 38 | |
| Judson Althoff | Microsoft Corp CDR | 51 | |
| Rachel Brand | Walmart Inc CDR | 49 | |
| William White | Walmart Inc CDR | N/A | |
| Alice Jolla | Microsoft Corp CDR | 58 | |
| Hossein Nowbar | Microsoft Corp CDR | N/A | |
| Aaron Anderson | Meta Platforms CDR | N/A | |
| Chris Kondo | Apple Inc CDR | N/A | |
| Xiaotong Zhu | Tesla Inc CDR | 44 | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.14 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0424 |
Rogers Communications Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Rogers Communications' board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Rogers Communications inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Rogers. The board's role is to monitor Rogers Communications' management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Rogers Communications' inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Rogers Communications' outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Terrie Tweddle, Chief Officer | ||
| FCA FCA, CEO Pres | ||
| Lisa Durocher, Ex Services | ||
| Philip Hartling, President Wireless | ||
| FCPA FCA, CEO President | ||
| Marisa Wyse, Chief Secretary | ||
| Robert Depatie, President Division | ||
| Mahes Wickramasinghe, President Operations | ||
| Glenn Brandt, Chief Officer | ||
| Paulina Molnar, VP Management | ||
| Mark Kennedy, Chief Officer | ||
| Paul Carpino, Vice Relations | ||
| Iain Kennedy, Chief Officer | ||
| Thomas Turner, President Business | ||
| Ronald McKenzie, Chief Officer | ||
| Colette Watson, President Media | ||
| Bret Leech, President Residential | ||
| H Bains, Chief Officer | ||
| Marisa Fabiano, Chief Officer |
Rogers Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Rogers Communications a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.14 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.0424 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.07 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.27 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 72.23 B | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 111.15 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 97.62 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 0.03 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 4.35 K | ||||
| Price To Earning | 16.07 X |
Pair Trading with Rogers Communications
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Rogers Communications position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Rogers Communications will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Rogers Stock
| 0.75 | JPM | JPMorgan Chase | PairCorr |
| 0.74 | RY-PS | Royal Bank Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
| 0.72 | BOFA | Bank of America | PairCorr |
| 0.67 | RY-PM | Royal Bank Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
| 0.62 | TD-PFI | Toronto Dominion Bank Earnings Call This Week | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Rogers Communications could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Rogers Communications when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Rogers Communications - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Rogers Communications to buy it.
The correlation of Rogers Communications is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Rogers Communications moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Rogers Communications moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Rogers Communications can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Rogers Stock Analysis
When running Rogers Communications' price analysis, check to measure Rogers Communications' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Rogers Communications is operating at the current time. Most of Rogers Communications' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Rogers Communications' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Rogers Communications' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Rogers Communications to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.