Correlation Between Las Vegas and Smithson Investment

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Las Vegas and Smithson Investment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Las Vegas and Smithson Investment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Las Vegas Sands and Smithson Investment Trust, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Las Vegas and Smithson Investment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Las Vegas with a short position of Smithson Investment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Las Vegas and Smithson Investment.

Diversification Opportunities for Las Vegas and Smithson Investment

0.17

Correlation Coefficient

Las Vegas  Smithson Investment

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Las and Smithson is 0.17. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Las Vegas Sands and Smithson Investment Trust in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Smithson Investment Trust and Las Vegas is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Las Vegas Sands are associated (or correlated) with Smithson Investment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Smithson Investment Trust has no effect on the direction of Las Vegas i.e., Las Vegas and Smithson Investment go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Las Vegas and Smithson Investment

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Las Vegas Sands is expected to generate 2.29 times more return on investment than Smithson Investment. However, Las Vegas is 2.29 times more volatile than Smithson Investment Trust. It trades about 0.24 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Smithson Investment Trust is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,901  in Las Vegas Sands on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,394  from holding Las Vegas Sands or generate 35.73% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	98.48%
Values	Daily Returns

Las Vegas Sands  vs.  Smithson Investment Trust

Las Vegas Sands

Risk-Adjusted Performance

19 of 100

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Las Vegas Sands are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively unsteady basic indicators, Las Vegas unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Smithson Investment Trust

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Smithson Investment Trust are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, Smithson Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.

Pair Trading with Las Vegas and Smithson Investment

The main advantage of trading using opposite Las Vegas and Smithson Investment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Las Vegas position performs unexpectedly, Smithson Investment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Smithson Investment will offset losses from the drop in Smithson Investment's long position.

The idea behind Las Vegas Sands and Smithson Investment Trust pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Share Portfolio module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.