Correlation Between Aspeed Technology and Thinking Electronic

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Aspeed Technology and Thinking Electronic at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Aspeed Technology and Thinking Electronic into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Aspeed Technology and Thinking Electronic Industrial, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Aspeed Technology and Thinking Electronic and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Aspeed Technology with a short position of Thinking Electronic. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Aspeed Technology and Thinking Electronic.

Diversification Opportunities for Aspeed Technology and Thinking Electronic

0.68
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Aspeed and Thinking is 0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Aspeed Technology and Thinking Electronic Industrial in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Thinking Electronic and Aspeed Technology is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Aspeed Technology are associated (or correlated) with Thinking Electronic. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Thinking Electronic has no effect on the direction of Aspeed Technology i.e., Aspeed Technology and Thinking Electronic go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Aspeed Technology and Thinking Electronic

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Aspeed Technology is expected to generate 2.84 times more return on investment than Thinking Electronic. However, Aspeed Technology is 2.84 times more volatile than Thinking Electronic Industrial. It trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Thinking Electronic Industrial is currently generating about -0.14 per unit of risk. If you would invest  427,000  in Aspeed Technology on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (45,500) from holding Aspeed Technology or give up 10.66% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Aspeed Technology  vs.  Thinking Electronic Industrial

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Aspeed Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Aspeed Technology has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest abnormal performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the latest fuss on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-term gains for the venture sophisticated investors.
Thinking Electronic 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Thinking Electronic Industrial has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest abnormal performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the latest fuss on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-term gains for the venture sophisticated investors.

Aspeed Technology and Thinking Electronic Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Aspeed Technology and Thinking Electronic

The main advantage of trading using opposite Aspeed Technology and Thinking Electronic positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Aspeed Technology position performs unexpectedly, Thinking Electronic can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Thinking Electronic will offset losses from the drop in Thinking Electronic's long position.
The idea behind Aspeed Technology and Thinking Electronic Industrial pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Pattern Recognition module to use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Crypto Correlations
Use cryptocurrency correlation module to diversify your cryptocurrency portfolio across multiple coins
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume