Correlation Between HANOVER INSURANCE and Ming Le
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both HANOVER INSURANCE and Ming Le at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining HANOVER INSURANCE and Ming Le into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between HANOVER INSURANCE and Ming Le Sports, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on HANOVER INSURANCE and Ming Le and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in HANOVER INSURANCE with a short position of Ming Le. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of HANOVER INSURANCE and Ming Le.
Diversification Opportunities for HANOVER INSURANCE and Ming Le
0.87 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between HANOVER and Ming is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding HANOVER INSURANCE and Ming Le Sports in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ming Le Sports and HANOVER INSURANCE is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on HANOVER INSURANCE are associated (or correlated) with Ming Le. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ming Le Sports has no effect on the direction of HANOVER INSURANCE i.e., HANOVER INSURANCE and Ming Le go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between HANOVER INSURANCE and Ming Le
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon HANOVER INSURANCE is expected to generate 1.65 times less return on investment than Ming Le. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, HANOVER INSURANCE is 3.75 times less risky than Ming Le. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Ming Le Sports is currently generating about 0.06 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 105.00 in Ming Le Sports on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 15.00 from holding Ming Le Sports or generate 14.29% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Together |
Strength | Strong |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
HANOVER INSURANCE vs. Ming Le Sports
Performance |
Timeline |
HANOVER INSURANCE |
Ming Le Sports |
HANOVER INSURANCE and Ming Le Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with HANOVER INSURANCE and Ming Le
The main advantage of trading using opposite HANOVER INSURANCE and Ming Le positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if HANOVER INSURANCE position performs unexpectedly, Ming Le can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ming Le will offset losses from the drop in Ming Le's long position.HANOVER INSURANCE vs. G III Apparel Group | HANOVER INSURANCE vs. American Eagle Outfitters | HANOVER INSURANCE vs. TFS FINANCIAL | HANOVER INSURANCE vs. URBAN OUTFITTERS |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Search module to search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets.
Other Complementary Tools
ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world | |
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. |