Correlation Between Baillie Gifford and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Baillie Gifford and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Baillie Gifford and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Baillie Gifford Health and Goldman Sachs Dynamic, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Baillie Gifford and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Baillie Gifford with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Baillie Gifford and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Baillie Gifford and Goldman Sachs

-0.44
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Baillie and Goldman is -0.44. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Baillie Gifford Health and Goldman Sachs Dynamic in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Dynamic and Baillie Gifford is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Baillie Gifford Health are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Dynamic has no effect on the direction of Baillie Gifford i.e., Baillie Gifford and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Baillie Gifford and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Baillie Gifford Health is expected to under-perform the Goldman Sachs. In addition to that, Baillie Gifford is 1.96 times more volatile than Goldman Sachs Dynamic. It trades about -0.01 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Goldman Sachs Dynamic is currently generating about 0.32 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,010  in Goldman Sachs Dynamic on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  109.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Dynamic or generate 5.42% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy95.45%
ValuesDaily Returns

Baillie Gifford Health  vs.  Goldman Sachs Dynamic

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Baillie Gifford Health 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Baillie Gifford Health has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Baillie Gifford is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Dynamic 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Dynamic are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Goldman Sachs may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Baillie Gifford and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Baillie Gifford and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Baillie Gifford and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Baillie Gifford position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Baillie Gifford Health and Goldman Sachs Dynamic pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Suggestion module to get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios.

Other Complementary Tools

Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated