Correlation Between Consolidated Communications and Microsoft

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Consolidated Communications and Microsoft at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Consolidated Communications and Microsoft into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Consolidated Communications Holdings and Microsoft, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Consolidated Communications and Microsoft and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Consolidated Communications with a short position of Microsoft. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Consolidated Communications and Microsoft.

Diversification Opportunities for Consolidated Communications and Microsoft

0.78
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Consolidated and Microsoft is 0.78. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Consolidated Communications Ho and Microsoft in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Microsoft and Consolidated Communications is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Consolidated Communications Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Microsoft. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Microsoft has no effect on the direction of Consolidated Communications i.e., Consolidated Communications and Microsoft go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Consolidated Communications and Microsoft

Assuming the 90 days horizon Consolidated Communications is expected to generate 1.33 times less return on investment than Microsoft. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Consolidated Communications Holdings is 1.93 times less risky than Microsoft. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Microsoft is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  38,429  in Microsoft on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  3,836  from holding Microsoft or generate 9.98% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Consolidated Communications Ho  vs.  Microsoft

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Consolidated Communications 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Consolidated Communications Holdings are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly unsteady basic indicators, Consolidated Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively fragile basic indicators, Microsoft may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Consolidated Communications and Microsoft Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Consolidated Communications and Microsoft

The main advantage of trading using opposite Consolidated Communications and Microsoft positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Consolidated Communications position performs unexpectedly, Microsoft can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Microsoft will offset losses from the drop in Microsoft's long position.
The idea behind Consolidated Communications Holdings and Microsoft pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Center
All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Bond Analysis
Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios.
Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume