Correlation Between Carnegie Clean and Aspire Mining

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Carnegie Clean and Aspire Mining at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Carnegie Clean and Aspire Mining into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Carnegie Clean Energy and Aspire Mining, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Carnegie Clean and Aspire Mining and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Carnegie Clean with a short position of Aspire Mining. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Carnegie Clean and Aspire Mining.

Diversification Opportunities for Carnegie Clean and Aspire Mining

0.12
  Correlation Coefficient

Average diversification

The 3 months correlation between Carnegie and Aspire is 0.12. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Carnegie Clean Energy and Aspire Mining in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Aspire Mining and Carnegie Clean is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Carnegie Clean Energy are associated (or correlated) with Aspire Mining. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Aspire Mining has no effect on the direction of Carnegie Clean i.e., Carnegie Clean and Aspire Mining go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Carnegie Clean and Aspire Mining

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Carnegie Clean Energy is expected to generate 0.73 times more return on investment than Aspire Mining. However, Carnegie Clean Energy is 1.37 times less risky than Aspire Mining. It trades about 0.0 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Aspire Mining is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3.90  in Carnegie Clean Energy on September 22, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (0.10) from holding Carnegie Clean Energy or give up 2.56% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Carnegie Clean Energy  vs.  Aspire Mining

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Carnegie Clean Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Carnegie Clean Energy has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Carnegie Clean is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Aspire Mining 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Aspire Mining has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest uncertain performance, the Stock's primary indicators remain stable and the newest uproar on Wall Street may also be a sign of mid-term gains for the firm private investors.

Carnegie Clean and Aspire Mining Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Carnegie Clean and Aspire Mining

The main advantage of trading using opposite Carnegie Clean and Aspire Mining positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Carnegie Clean position performs unexpectedly, Aspire Mining can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Aspire Mining will offset losses from the drop in Aspire Mining's long position.
The idea behind Carnegie Clean Energy and Aspire Mining pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Forecasting module to use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum.

Other Complementary Tools

Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators
Sectors
List of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA