Correlation Between Chesapeake Energy and Stella Jones

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Chesapeake Energy and Stella Jones at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Chesapeake Energy and Stella Jones into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Chesapeake Energy and Stella Jones, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Chesapeake Energy and Stella Jones and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Chesapeake Energy with a short position of Stella Jones. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Chesapeake Energy and Stella Jones.

Diversification Opportunities for Chesapeake Energy and Stella Jones

0.63
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Chesapeake and Stella is 0.63. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Chesapeake Energy and Stella Jones in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Stella Jones and Chesapeake Energy is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Chesapeake Energy are associated (or correlated) with Stella Jones. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Stella Jones has no effect on the direction of Chesapeake Energy i.e., Chesapeake Energy and Stella Jones go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Chesapeake Energy and Stella Jones

Assuming the 90 days horizon Chesapeake Energy is expected to generate 200.08 times more return on investment than Stella Jones. However, Chesapeake Energy is 200.08 times more volatile than Stella Jones. It trades about 0.4 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Stella Jones is currently generating about -0.2 per unit of risk. If you would invest  6,070  in Chesapeake Energy on September 1, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,119  from holding Chesapeake Energy or generate 18.43% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy7.94%
ValuesDaily Returns

Chesapeake Energy  vs.  Stella Jones

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Chesapeake Energy 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Strong
Over the last 90 days Chesapeake Energy has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Chesapeake Energy showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Stella Jones 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Stella Jones has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fragile performance in the last few months, the Stock's forward-looking indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in December 2024. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the company stockholders.

Chesapeake Energy and Stella Jones Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Chesapeake Energy and Stella Jones

The main advantage of trading using opposite Chesapeake Energy and Stella Jones positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Chesapeake Energy position performs unexpectedly, Stella Jones can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Stella Jones will offset losses from the drop in Stella Jones' long position.
The idea behind Chesapeake Energy and Stella Jones pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Earnings Calls module to check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments
Stock Screener
Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook.
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Money Flow Index
Determine momentum by analyzing Money Flow Index and other technical indicators