Correlation Between Stone Harbor and Korea Closed

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Stone Harbor and Korea Closed at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Stone Harbor and Korea Closed into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Stone Harbor Emerging and Korea Closed, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Stone Harbor and Korea Closed and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Stone Harbor with a short position of Korea Closed. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Stone Harbor and Korea Closed.

Diversification Opportunities for Stone Harbor and Korea Closed

0.44
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Stone and Korea is 0.44. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Stone Harbor Emerging and Korea Closed in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Korea Closed and Stone Harbor is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Stone Harbor Emerging are associated (or correlated) with Korea Closed. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Korea Closed has no effect on the direction of Stone Harbor i.e., Stone Harbor and Korea Closed go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Stone Harbor and Korea Closed

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Stone Harbor Emerging is expected to generate 0.86 times more return on investment than Korea Closed. However, Stone Harbor Emerging is 1.16 times less risky than Korea Closed. It trades about -0.01 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Korea Closed is currently generating about -0.22 per unit of risk. If you would invest  511.00  in Stone Harbor Emerging on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (4.00) from holding Stone Harbor Emerging or give up 0.78% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Stone Harbor Emerging  vs.  Korea Closed

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Stone Harbor Emerging 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Stone Harbor Emerging has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. Despite nearly stable fundamental indicators, Stone Harbor is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.
Korea Closed 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Korea Closed has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. Despite unsteady performance in the last few months, the Fund's technical and fundamental indicators remain nearly stable which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long-run up-swing for the mutual fund stockholders.

Stone Harbor and Korea Closed Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Stone Harbor and Korea Closed

The main advantage of trading using opposite Stone Harbor and Korea Closed positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Stone Harbor position performs unexpectedly, Korea Closed can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Korea Closed will offset losses from the drop in Korea Closed's long position.
The idea behind Stone Harbor Emerging and Korea Closed pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Analysis module to research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities.

Other Complementary Tools

Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Correlation Analysis
Reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated
Aroon Oscillator
Analyze current equity momentum using Aroon Oscillator and other momentum ratios
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Portfolio Diagnostics
Use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings