Correlation Between Energizer Holdings and Microvast Holdings

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Energizer Holdings and Microvast Holdings at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Energizer Holdings and Microvast Holdings into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Energizer Holdings and Microvast Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Energizer Holdings and Microvast Holdings and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Energizer Holdings with a short position of Microvast Holdings. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Energizer Holdings and Microvast Holdings.

Diversification Opportunities for Energizer Holdings and Microvast Holdings

0.74
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Energizer and Microvast is 0.74. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Energizer Holdings and Microvast Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Microvast Holdings and Energizer Holdings is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Energizer Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Microvast Holdings. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Microvast Holdings has no effect on the direction of Energizer Holdings i.e., Energizer Holdings and Microvast Holdings go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Energizer Holdings and Microvast Holdings

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Energizer Holdings is expected to generate 13.49 times less return on investment than Microvast Holdings. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Energizer Holdings is 16.48 times less risky than Microvast Holdings. It trades about 0.18 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Microvast Holdings is currently generating about 0.15 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2.40  in Microvast Holdings on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  5.11  from holding Microvast Holdings or generate 212.92% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy98.44%
ValuesDaily Returns

Energizer Holdings  vs.  Microvast Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Energizer Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

14 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Energizer Holdings are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Even with relatively inconsistent basic indicators, Energizer Holdings reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Microvast Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

11 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microvast Holdings are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Microvast Holdings showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Energizer Holdings and Microvast Holdings Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Energizer Holdings and Microvast Holdings

The main advantage of trading using opposite Energizer Holdings and Microvast Holdings positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Energizer Holdings position performs unexpectedly, Microvast Holdings can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Microvast Holdings will offset losses from the drop in Microvast Holdings' long position.
The idea behind Energizer Holdings and Microvast Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Analyst Advice module to analyst recommendations and target price estimates broken down by several categories.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Analysis
Research over 250,000 global equities including funds, stocks and ETFs to find investment opportunities
Cryptocurrency Center
Build and monitor diversified portfolio of extremely risky digital assets and cryptocurrency
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon