Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Aggressive Balanced

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Aggressive Balanced at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Aggressive Balanced into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Clean and Aggressive Balanced Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Aggressive Balanced and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Aggressive Balanced. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Aggressive Balanced.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Aggressive Balanced

-0.79

Correlation Coefficient

Goldman Sachs  Aggressive Balanced

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Aggressive is -0.79. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Clean and Aggressive Balanced Allocation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Aggressive Balanced and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Clean are associated (or correlated) with Aggressive Balanced. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Aggressive Balanced has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Aggressive Balanced go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Aggressive Balanced

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Clean is expected to under-perform the Aggressive Balanced. In addition to that, Goldman Sachs is 1.96 times more volatile than Aggressive Balanced Allocation. It trades about -0.19 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Aggressive Balanced Allocation is currently generating about 0.2 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  1,172  in Aggressive Balanced Allocation on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  86.00  from holding Aggressive Balanced Allocation or generate 7.34% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Goldman Sachs Clean  vs.  Aggressive Balanced Allocation

Goldman Sachs Clean

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Clean has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of weak performance in the last few months, the Fund's fundamental drivers remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The current disturbance may also be a sign of long term up-swing for the fund investors.

Aggressive Balanced

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

Solid

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Aggressive Balanced Allocation are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak forward indicators, Aggressive Balanced may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Aggressive Balanced

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Aggressive Balanced positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Aggressive Balanced can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Aggressive Balanced will offset losses from the drop in Aggressive Balanced's long position.

The idea behind Goldman Sachs Clean and Aggressive Balanced Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Competition Analyzer module to analyze and compare many basic indicators for a group of related or unrelated entities.