Correlation Between Gfl Environmental and Meta Platforms

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Gfl Environmental and Meta Platforms at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Gfl Environmental and Meta Platforms into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Gfl Environmental Holdings and Meta Platforms CDR, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Gfl Environmental and Meta Platforms and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Gfl Environmental with a short position of Meta Platforms. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Gfl Environmental and Meta Platforms.

Diversification Opportunities for Gfl Environmental and Meta Platforms

0.41
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Gfl and Meta is 0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Gfl Environmental Holdings and Meta Platforms CDR in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Meta Platforms CDR and Gfl Environmental is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Gfl Environmental Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Meta Platforms. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Meta Platforms CDR has no effect on the direction of Gfl Environmental i.e., Gfl Environmental and Meta Platforms go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Gfl Environmental and Meta Platforms

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Gfl Environmental Holdings is expected to generate 0.93 times more return on investment than Meta Platforms. However, Gfl Environmental Holdings is 1.07 times less risky than Meta Platforms. It trades about 0.2 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Meta Platforms CDR is currently generating about 0.18 per unit of risk. If you would invest  5,469  in Gfl Environmental Holdings on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,046  from holding Gfl Environmental Holdings or generate 19.13% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Gfl Environmental Holdings  vs.  Meta Platforms CDR

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Gfl Environmental 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

15 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Gfl Environmental Holdings are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating essential indicators, Gfl Environmental displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Meta Platforms CDR 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Meta Platforms CDR are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather unfluctuating technical and fundamental indicators, Meta Platforms exhibited solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Gfl Environmental and Meta Platforms Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Gfl Environmental and Meta Platforms

The main advantage of trading using opposite Gfl Environmental and Meta Platforms positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Gfl Environmental position performs unexpectedly, Meta Platforms can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Meta Platforms will offset losses from the drop in Meta Platforms' long position.
The idea behind Gfl Environmental Holdings and Meta Platforms CDR pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Equity Search module to search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets.

Other Complementary Tools

ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Bollinger Bands
Use Bollinger Bands indicator to analyze target price for a given investing horizon
Volatility Analysis
Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum