Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Hartford Schroders

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Hartford Schroders at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Hartford Schroders into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs Inflation and Hartford Schroders Emerging, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Hartford Schroders and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Hartford Schroders. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Hartford Schroders.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Hartford Schroders

0.34

Correlation Coefficient

Goldman Sachs  Hartford Schroders

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Hartford is 0.34. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs Inflation and Hartford Schroders Emerging in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Hartford Schroders and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs Inflation are associated (or correlated) with Hartford Schroders. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Hartford Schroders has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Hartford Schroders go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Hartford Schroders

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs Inflation is expected to under-perform the Hartford Schroders. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Goldman Sachs Inflation is 3.59 times less risky than Hartford Schroders. The mutual fund trades about -0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Hartford Schroders Emerging is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,714  in Hartford Schroders Emerging on September 15, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  37.00  from holding Hartford Schroders Emerging or generate 2.16% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Weak
Accuracy	98.46%
Values	Daily Returns

Goldman Sachs Inflation  vs.  Hartford Schroders Emerging

Goldman Sachs Inflation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs Inflation has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Hartford Schroders

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Hartford Schroders Emerging are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Hartford Schroders is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Hartford Schroders

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Hartford Schroders positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Hartford Schroders can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Hartford Schroders will offset losses from the drop in Hartford Schroders' long position.

The idea behind Goldman Sachs Inflation and Hartford Schroders Emerging pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.