Correlation Between Goldman Sachs and Spring Valley

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Goldman Sachs and Spring Valley at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Goldman Sachs and Spring Valley into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Goldman Sachs International and Spring Valley Acquisition, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Goldman Sachs and Spring Valley and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Goldman Sachs with a short position of Spring Valley. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Goldman Sachs and Spring Valley.

Diversification Opportunities for Goldman Sachs and Spring Valley

-0.16

Correlation Coefficient

Goldman Sachs  Spring Valley

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Goldman and Spring is -0.16. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Goldman Sachs International and Spring Valley Acquisition in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Spring Valley Acquisition and Goldman Sachs is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Goldman Sachs International are associated (or correlated) with Spring Valley. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Spring Valley Acquisition has no effect on the direction of Goldman Sachs i.e., Goldman Sachs and Spring Valley go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Goldman Sachs and Spring Valley

Assuming the 90 days horizon Goldman Sachs International is expected to generate 3.72 times more return on investment than Spring Valley. However, Goldman Sachs is 3.72 times more volatile than Spring Valley Acquisition. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Spring Valley Acquisition is currently generating about 0.09 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,061  in Goldman Sachs International on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  281.00  from holding Goldman Sachs International or generate 26.48% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	99.8%
Values	Daily Returns

Goldman Sachs International  vs.  Spring Valley Acquisition

Goldman Sachs Intern

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Goldman Sachs International has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Spring Valley Acquisition

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Spring Valley Acquisition has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite fairly strong forward indicators, Spring Valley is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price confusion, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the traders.

Pair Trading with Goldman Sachs and Spring Valley

The main advantage of trading using opposite Goldman Sachs and Spring Valley positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Goldman Sachs position performs unexpectedly, Spring Valley can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Spring Valley will offset losses from the drop in Spring Valley's long position.

The idea behind Goldman Sachs International and Spring Valley Acquisition pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Performance Analysis module to check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation.