Correlation Between GM and Siward Crystal

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both GM and Siward Crystal at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining GM and Siward Crystal into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between General Motors and Siward Crystal Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on GM and Siward Crystal and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in GM with a short position of Siward Crystal. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of GM and Siward Crystal.

Diversification Opportunities for GM and Siward Crystal

-0.75
  Correlation Coefficient

Pay attention - limited upside

The 3 months correlation between GM and Siward is -0.75. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding General Motors and Siward Crystal Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Siward Crystal Technology and GM is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on General Motors are associated (or correlated) with Siward Crystal. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Siward Crystal Technology has no effect on the direction of GM i.e., GM and Siward Crystal go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between GM and Siward Crystal

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon General Motors is expected to generate 1.4 times more return on investment than Siward Crystal. However, GM is 1.4 times more volatile than Siward Crystal Technology. It trades about 0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Siward Crystal Technology is currently generating about -0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest  3,864  in General Motors on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,410  from holding General Motors or generate 36.49% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy98.3%
ValuesDaily Returns

General Motors  vs.  Siward Crystal Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
General Motors 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

7 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in General Motors are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating primary indicators, GM displayed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Siward Crystal Technology 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Siward Crystal Technology has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of latest abnormal performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain stable and the latest fuss on Wall Street may also be a sign of long-term gains for the venture sophisticated investors.

GM and Siward Crystal Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with GM and Siward Crystal

The main advantage of trading using opposite GM and Siward Crystal positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if GM position performs unexpectedly, Siward Crystal can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Siward Crystal will offset losses from the drop in Siward Crystal's long position.
The idea behind General Motors and Siward Crystal Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Content Syndication module to quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal.

Other Complementary Tools

Premium Stories
Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
Equity Valuation
Check real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data
Portfolio Dashboard
Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments
Headlines Timeline
Stay connected to all market stories and filter out noise. Drill down to analyze hype elasticity