Correlation Between Huntington Ingalls and Mercury Systems

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Huntington Ingalls and Mercury Systems at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Huntington Ingalls and Mercury Systems into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Huntington Ingalls Industries and Mercury Systems, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Huntington Ingalls and Mercury Systems and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Huntington Ingalls with a short position of Mercury Systems. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Huntington Ingalls and Mercury Systems.

Diversification Opportunities for Huntington Ingalls and Mercury Systems

-0.47
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Huntington and Mercury is -0.47. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Huntington Ingalls Industries and Mercury Systems in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mercury Systems and Huntington Ingalls is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Huntington Ingalls Industries are associated (or correlated) with Mercury Systems. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mercury Systems has no effect on the direction of Huntington Ingalls i.e., Huntington Ingalls and Mercury Systems go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Huntington Ingalls and Mercury Systems

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Huntington Ingalls is expected to generate 4.35 times less return on investment than Mercury Systems. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Huntington Ingalls Industries is 2.7 times less risky than Mercury Systems. It trades about 0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mercury Systems is currently generating about 0.21 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,318  in Mercury Systems on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  795.00  from holding Mercury Systems or generate 23.96% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Huntington Ingalls Industries  vs.  Mercury Systems

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Huntington Ingalls 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Huntington Ingalls Industries has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite uncertain performance in the last few months, the Stock's forward indicators remain fairly strong which may send shares a bit higher in January 2025. The recent confusion may also be a sign of long-lasting up-swing for the firm traders.
Mercury Systems 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mercury Systems are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Mercury Systems showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Huntington Ingalls and Mercury Systems Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Huntington Ingalls and Mercury Systems

The main advantage of trading using opposite Huntington Ingalls and Mercury Systems positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Huntington Ingalls position performs unexpectedly, Mercury Systems can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mercury Systems will offset losses from the drop in Mercury Systems' long position.
The idea behind Huntington Ingalls Industries and Mercury Systems pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Alpha Finder module to use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk.

Other Complementary Tools

Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals