Correlation Between Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Legg Mason Global and Goldman Sachs Mlp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Legg Mason with a short position of Goldman Sachs. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs.

Diversification Opportunities for Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs

-0.27
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Legg and Goldman is -0.27. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Legg Mason Global and Goldman Sachs Mlp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Goldman Sachs Mlp and Legg Mason is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Legg Mason Global are associated (or correlated) with Goldman Sachs. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Goldman Sachs Mlp has no effect on the direction of Legg Mason i.e., Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs

Assuming the 90 days horizon Legg Mason Global is expected to under-perform the Goldman Sachs. But the mutual fund apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Legg Mason Global is 2.99 times less risky than Goldman Sachs. The mutual fund trades about -0.02 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Goldman Sachs Mlp is currently generating about 0.13 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,284  in Goldman Sachs Mlp on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  190.00  from holding Goldman Sachs Mlp or generate 5.79% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthInsignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Legg Mason Global  vs.  Goldman Sachs Mlp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Legg Mason Global 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Legg Mason Global has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to fund investors. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Legg Mason is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Goldman Sachs Mlp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

10 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Good
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Goldman Sachs Mlp are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Goldman Sachs is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs

The main advantage of trading using opposite Legg Mason and Goldman Sachs positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Legg Mason position performs unexpectedly, Goldman Sachs can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Goldman Sachs will offset losses from the drop in Goldman Sachs' long position.
The idea behind Legg Mason Global and Goldman Sachs Mlp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Companies Directory module to evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals.

Other Complementary Tools

Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Economic Indicators
Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Price Ceiling Movement
Calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments