Correlation Between Litigation Capital and Ashtead Technology
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Litigation Capital and Ashtead Technology at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Litigation Capital and Ashtead Technology into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Litigation Capital Management and Ashtead Technology Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Litigation Capital and Ashtead Technology and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Litigation Capital with a short position of Ashtead Technology. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Litigation Capital and Ashtead Technology.
Diversification Opportunities for Litigation Capital and Ashtead Technology
-0.6 | Correlation Coefficient |
Excellent diversification
The 3 months correlation between Litigation and Ashtead is -0.6. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Litigation Capital Management and Ashtead Technology Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Ashtead Technology and Litigation Capital is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Litigation Capital Management are associated (or correlated) with Ashtead Technology. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Ashtead Technology has no effect on the direction of Litigation Capital i.e., Litigation Capital and Ashtead Technology go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Litigation Capital and Ashtead Technology
Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Litigation Capital Management is expected to generate 0.81 times more return on investment than Ashtead Technology. However, Litigation Capital Management is 1.23 times less risky than Ashtead Technology. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Ashtead Technology Holdings is currently generating about -0.08 per unit of risk. If you would invest 9,925 in Litigation Capital Management on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 1,800 from holding Litigation Capital Management or generate 18.14% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 100.0% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Litigation Capital Management vs. Ashtead Technology Holdings
Performance |
Timeline |
Litigation Capital |
Ashtead Technology |
Litigation Capital and Ashtead Technology Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Litigation Capital and Ashtead Technology
The main advantage of trading using opposite Litigation Capital and Ashtead Technology positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Litigation Capital position performs unexpectedly, Ashtead Technology can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Ashtead Technology will offset losses from the drop in Ashtead Technology's long position.Litigation Capital vs. AMG Advanced Metallurgical | Litigation Capital vs. American Homes 4 | Litigation Capital vs. Cairn Homes PLC | Litigation Capital vs. Ecclesiastical Insurance Office |
Ashtead Technology vs. Zoom Video Communications | Ashtead Technology vs. Enbridge | Ashtead Technology vs. Coor Service Management | Ashtead Technology vs. Surgical Science Sweden |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sign In To Macroaxis module to sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules.
Other Complementary Tools
Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments | |
Piotroski F Score Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals | |
ETF Categories List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments | |
Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets |