Correlation Between Microsoft and Mackenzie Aggregate

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Mackenzie Aggregate at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Mackenzie Aggregate into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Mackenzie Aggregate Bond, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Mackenzie Aggregate and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Mackenzie Aggregate. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Mackenzie Aggregate.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Mackenzie Aggregate

0.33
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Mackenzie is 0.33. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Mackenzie Aggregate Bond in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mackenzie Aggregate Bond and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Mackenzie Aggregate. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mackenzie Aggregate Bond has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Mackenzie Aggregate go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Mackenzie Aggregate

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 3.59 times more return on investment than Mackenzie Aggregate. However, Microsoft is 3.59 times more volatile than Mackenzie Aggregate Bond. It trades about 0.06 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mackenzie Aggregate Bond is currently generating about -0.1 per unit of risk. If you would invest  43,048  in Microsoft on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,908  from holding Microsoft or generate 4.43% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Mackenzie Aggregate Bond

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Insignificant
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively stable technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
Mackenzie Aggregate Bond 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Mackenzie Aggregate Bond has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of very healthy fundamental drivers, Mackenzie Aggregate is not utilizing all of its potentials. The recent stock price disarray, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Microsoft and Mackenzie Aggregate Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Mackenzie Aggregate

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Mackenzie Aggregate positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Mackenzie Aggregate can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mackenzie Aggregate will offset losses from the drop in Mackenzie Aggregate's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Mackenzie Aggregate Bond pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Portfolio Anywhere
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device