Correlation Between Nasdaq and Australian Strategic
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Nasdaq and Australian Strategic at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Nasdaq and Australian Strategic into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Nasdaq Inc and Australian Strategic Materials, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Nasdaq and Australian Strategic and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Nasdaq with a short position of Australian Strategic. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Nasdaq and Australian Strategic.
Diversification Opportunities for Nasdaq and Australian Strategic
-0.68 | Correlation Coefficient |
Excellent diversification
The 3 months correlation between Nasdaq and Australian is -0.68. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Nasdaq Inc and Australian Strategic Materials in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Australian Strategic and Nasdaq is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Nasdaq Inc are associated (or correlated) with Australian Strategic. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Australian Strategic has no effect on the direction of Nasdaq i.e., Nasdaq and Australian Strategic go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Nasdaq and Australian Strategic
Given the investment horizon of 90 days Nasdaq Inc is expected to generate 0.21 times more return on investment than Australian Strategic. However, Nasdaq Inc is 4.82 times less risky than Australian Strategic. It trades about 0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Australian Strategic Materials is currently generating about 0.01 per unit of risk. If you would invest 7,308 in Nasdaq Inc on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of 779.00 from holding Nasdaq Inc or generate 10.66% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
Direction | Moves Against |
Strength | Weak |
Accuracy | 98.44% |
Values | Daily Returns |
Nasdaq Inc vs. Australian Strategic Materials
Performance |
Timeline |
Nasdaq Inc |
Australian Strategic |
Nasdaq and Australian Strategic Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
Returns |
Pair Trading with Nasdaq and Australian Strategic
The main advantage of trading using opposite Nasdaq and Australian Strategic positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Nasdaq position performs unexpectedly, Australian Strategic can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Australian Strategic will offset losses from the drop in Australian Strategic's long position.The idea behind Nasdaq Inc and Australian Strategic Materials pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.Australian Strategic vs. Leading Edge Materials | Australian Strategic vs. Grid Metals Corp | Australian Strategic vs. Fireweed Zinc | Australian Strategic vs. First American Silver |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Comparator module to compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account.
Other Complementary Tools
Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
AI Portfolio Architect Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities | |
Instant Ratings Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
Options Analysis Analyze and evaluate options and option chains as a potential hedge for your portfolios | |
Portfolio Comparator Compare the composition, asset allocations and performance of any two portfolios in your account |