Correlation Between Insurance Australia and Cincinnati Financial

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Insurance Australia and Cincinnati Financial at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Insurance Australia and Cincinnati Financial into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Insurance Australia Group and Cincinnati Financial, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Insurance Australia and Cincinnati Financial and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Insurance Australia with a short position of Cincinnati Financial. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Insurance Australia and Cincinnati Financial.

Diversification Opportunities for Insurance Australia and Cincinnati Financial

0.84
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Insurance and Cincinnati is 0.84. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Insurance Australia Group and Cincinnati Financial in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Cincinnati Financial and Insurance Australia is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Insurance Australia Group are associated (or correlated) with Cincinnati Financial. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Cincinnati Financial has no effect on the direction of Insurance Australia i.e., Insurance Australia and Cincinnati Financial go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Insurance Australia and Cincinnati Financial

Assuming the 90 days horizon Insurance Australia is expected to generate 1.84 times less return on investment than Cincinnati Financial. In addition to that, Insurance Australia is 1.05 times more volatile than Cincinnati Financial. It trades about 0.11 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Cincinnati Financial is currently generating about 0.21 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  12,268  in Cincinnati Financial on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  2,942  from holding Cincinnati Financial or generate 23.98% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Insurance Australia Group  vs.  Cincinnati Financial

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Insurance Australia 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Insurance Australia Group are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Insurance Australia may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.
Cincinnati Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

16 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Solid
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cincinnati Financial are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, Cincinnati Financial reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Insurance Australia and Cincinnati Financial Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Insurance Australia and Cincinnati Financial

The main advantage of trading using opposite Insurance Australia and Cincinnati Financial positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Insurance Australia position performs unexpectedly, Cincinnati Financial can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Cincinnati Financial will offset losses from the drop in Cincinnati Financial's long position.
The idea behind Insurance Australia Group and Cincinnati Financial pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Insider Screener
Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
Content Syndication
Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance