Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Alimentation Couchen

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Alimentation Couchen at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Alimentation Couchen into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Alimentation Couchen Tard, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Alimentation Couchen and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Alimentation Couchen. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Alimentation Couchen.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Alimentation Couchen

0.6

Correlation Coefficient

Procter Gamble  Alimentation Couchen

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Alimentation is 0.6. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Alimentation Couchen Tard in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Alimentation Couchen Tard and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Alimentation Couchen. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Alimentation Couchen Tard has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Alimentation Couchen go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Alimentation Couchen

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to under-perform the Alimentation Couchen. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, Procter Gamble is 1.45 times less risky than Alimentation Couchen. The stock trades about -0.05 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Alimentation Couchen Tard is currently generating about 0.03 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  5,572  in Alimentation Couchen Tard on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  105.00  from holding Alimentation Couchen Tard or generate 1.88% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Significant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Alimentation Couchen Tard

Procter Gamble

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Alimentation Couchen Tard

Risk-Adjusted Performance

2 of 100

Weak

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Alimentation Couchen Tard are ranked lower than 2 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable basic indicators, Alimentation Couchen is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Alimentation Couchen

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Alimentation Couchen positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Alimentation Couchen can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Alimentation Couchen will offset losses from the drop in Alimentation Couchen's long position.

The idea behind Procter Gamble and Alimentation Couchen Tard pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Funds Screener module to find actively-traded funds from around the world traded on over 30 global exchanges.