Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Vera Bradley

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Vera Bradley at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Vera Bradley into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Procter Gamble and Vera Bradley, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Vera Bradley and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Vera Bradley. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Vera Bradley.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Vera Bradley

0.4

Correlation Coefficient

Procter Gamble  Vera Bradley

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Vera is 0.4. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Procter Gamble and Vera Bradley in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Vera Bradley and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Vera Bradley. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Vera Bradley has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Vera Bradley go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Vera Bradley

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 0.31 times more return on investment than Vera Bradley. However, Procter Gamble is 3.19 times less risky than Vera Bradley. It trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Vera Bradley is currently generating about -0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  17,620  in Procter Gamble on September 15, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (514.00) from holding Procter Gamble or give up 2.92% of portfolio value over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Weak
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Procter Gamble  vs.  Vera Bradley

Procter Gamble

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Procter Gamble has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Vera Bradley

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days Vera Bradley has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest inconsistent performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the company investors.

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Vera Bradley

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Vera Bradley positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Vera Bradley can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Vera Bradley will offset losses from the drop in Vera Bradley's long position.

The idea behind Procter Gamble and Vera Bradley pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Optimization module to compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk.