Correlation Between Procter Gamble and Exxon Mobil

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Procter Gamble and Exxon Mobil at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Procter Gamble and Exxon Mobil into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between The Procter Gamble and Exxon Mobil, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Procter Gamble and Exxon Mobil and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Procter Gamble with a short position of Exxon Mobil. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Procter Gamble and Exxon Mobil.

Diversification Opportunities for Procter Gamble and Exxon Mobil

0.47
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Procter and Exxon is 0.47. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding The Procter Gamble and Exxon Mobil in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Exxon Mobil and Procter Gamble is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on The Procter Gamble are associated (or correlated) with Exxon Mobil. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Exxon Mobil has no effect on the direction of Procter Gamble i.e., Procter Gamble and Exxon Mobil go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Procter Gamble and Exxon Mobil

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Procter Gamble is expected to generate 2.28 times less return on investment than Exxon Mobil. In addition to that, Procter Gamble is 1.02 times more volatile than Exxon Mobil. It trades about 0.04 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Exxon Mobil is currently generating about 0.1 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  7,740  in Exxon Mobil on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  687.00  from holding Exxon Mobil or generate 8.88% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy98.41%
ValuesDaily Returns

The Procter Gamble  vs.  Exxon Mobil

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Procter Gamble 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Modest
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in The Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat strong fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Exxon Mobil 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Exxon Mobil are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat uncertain basic indicators, Exxon Mobil may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Procter Gamble and Exxon Mobil Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Procter Gamble and Exxon Mobil

The main advantage of trading using opposite Procter Gamble and Exxon Mobil positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Procter Gamble position performs unexpectedly, Exxon Mobil can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Exxon Mobil will offset losses from the drop in Exxon Mobil's long position.
The idea behind The Procter Gamble and Exxon Mobil pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
Idea Breakdown
Analyze constituents of all Macroaxis ideas. Macroaxis investment ideas are predefined, sector-focused investing themes
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets
AI Portfolio Architect
Use AI to generate optimal portfolios and find profitable investment opportunities
Top Crypto Exchanges
Search and analyze digital assets across top global cryptocurrency exchanges