Correlation Between POWERGRID Infrastructure and SIL Investments

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both POWERGRID Infrastructure and SIL Investments at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining POWERGRID Infrastructure and SIL Investments into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between POWERGRID Infrastructure Investment and SIL Investments Limited, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on POWERGRID Infrastructure and SIL Investments and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in POWERGRID Infrastructure with a short position of SIL Investments. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of POWERGRID Infrastructure and SIL Investments.

Diversification Opportunities for POWERGRID Infrastructure and SIL Investments

-0.41
  Correlation Coefficient

Very good diversification

The 3 months correlation between POWERGRID and SIL is -0.41. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding POWERGRID Infrastructure Inves and SIL Investments Limited in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on SIL Investments and POWERGRID Infrastructure is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on POWERGRID Infrastructure Investment are associated (or correlated) with SIL Investments. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of SIL Investments has no effect on the direction of POWERGRID Infrastructure i.e., POWERGRID Infrastructure and SIL Investments go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between POWERGRID Infrastructure and SIL Investments

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon POWERGRID Infrastructure Investment is expected to under-perform the SIL Investments. But the stock apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, POWERGRID Infrastructure Investment is 6.94 times less risky than SIL Investments. The stock trades about -0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The SIL Investments Limited is currently generating about 0.11 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  57,320  in SIL Investments Limited on September 12, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  15,495  from holding SIL Investments Limited or generate 27.03% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Against 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy98.39%
ValuesDaily Returns

POWERGRID Infrastructure Inves  vs.  SIL Investments Limited

 Performance 
       Timeline  
POWERGRID Infrastructure 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days POWERGRID Infrastructure Investment has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of comparatively stable basic indicators, POWERGRID Infrastructure is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price uproar, may contribute to short-horizon losses for the private investors.
SIL Investments 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in SIL Investments Limited are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat conflicting forward indicators, SIL Investments sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

POWERGRID Infrastructure and SIL Investments Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with POWERGRID Infrastructure and SIL Investments

The main advantage of trading using opposite POWERGRID Infrastructure and SIL Investments positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if POWERGRID Infrastructure position performs unexpectedly, SIL Investments can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in SIL Investments will offset losses from the drop in SIL Investments' long position.
The idea behind POWERGRID Infrastructure Investment and SIL Investments Limited pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Diagnostics module to use generated alerts and portfolio events aggregator to diagnose current holdings.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Search
Search for actively traded equities including funds and ETFs from over 30 global markets
Portfolio Suggestion
Get suggestions outside of your existing asset allocation including your own model portfolios
USA ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
Portfolio Rebalancing
Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets