Correlation Between Reckitt Benckiser and Procter Gamble

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Reckitt Benckiser and Procter Gamble at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Reckitt Benckiser and Procter Gamble into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Reckitt Benckiser Group and Procter Gamble, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Reckitt Benckiser and Procter Gamble and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Reckitt Benckiser with a short position of Procter Gamble. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Reckitt Benckiser and Procter Gamble.

Diversification Opportunities for Reckitt Benckiser and Procter Gamble

-0.19

Correlation Coefficient

Reckitt Benckiser  Procter Gamble

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between Reckitt and Procter is -0.19. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Reckitt Benckiser Group and Procter Gamble in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Procter Gamble and Reckitt Benckiser is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Reckitt Benckiser Group are associated (or correlated) with Procter Gamble. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Procter Gamble has no effect on the direction of Reckitt Benckiser i.e., Reckitt Benckiser and Procter Gamble go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Reckitt Benckiser and Procter Gamble

Assuming the 90 days horizon Reckitt Benckiser Group is expected to generate 1.55 times more return on investment than Procter Gamble. However, Reckitt Benckiser is 1.55 times more volatile than Procter Gamble. It trades about 0.07 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Procter Gamble is currently generating about 0.06 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,166  in Reckitt Benckiser Group on September 2, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  76.00  from holding Reckitt Benckiser Group or generate 6.52% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Reckitt Benckiser Group  vs.  Procter Gamble

Reckitt Benckiser

Risk-Adjusted Performance

5 of 100

Modest

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Reckitt Benckiser Group are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly fragile essential indicators, Reckitt Benckiser may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Procter Gamble

Risk-Adjusted Performance

4 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Procter Gamble are ranked lower than 4 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly stable technical and fundamental indicators, Procter Gamble is not utilizing all of its potentials. The latest stock price disturbance, may contribute to mid-run losses for the stockholders.

Pair Trading with Reckitt Benckiser and Procter Gamble

The main advantage of trading using opposite Reckitt Benckiser and Procter Gamble positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Reckitt Benckiser position performs unexpectedly, Procter Gamble can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Procter Gamble will offset losses from the drop in Procter Gamble's long position.

The idea behind Reckitt Benckiser Group and Procter Gamble pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Center module to all portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios.