Correlation Between Regions Financial and Berkshire Hills

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Regions Financial and Berkshire Hills at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Regions Financial and Berkshire Hills into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Regions Financial and Berkshire Hills Bancorp, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Regions Financial and Berkshire Hills and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Regions Financial with a short position of Berkshire Hills. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Regions Financial and Berkshire Hills.

Diversification Opportunities for Regions Financial and Berkshire Hills

0.97
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Regions and Berkshire is 0.97. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Regions Financial and Berkshire Hills Bancorp in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Berkshire Hills Bancorp and Regions Financial is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Regions Financial are associated (or correlated) with Berkshire Hills. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Berkshire Hills Bancorp has no effect on the direction of Regions Financial i.e., Regions Financial and Berkshire Hills go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Regions Financial and Berkshire Hills

Allowing for the 90-day total investment horizon Regions Financial is expected to generate 1.09 times less return on investment than Berkshire Hills. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Regions Financial is 1.18 times less risky than Berkshire Hills. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Berkshire Hills Bancorp is currently generating about 0.1 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,649  in Berkshire Hills Bancorp on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  377.00  from holding Berkshire Hills Bancorp or generate 14.23% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Regions Financial  vs.  Berkshire Hills Bancorp

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Regions Financial 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Regions Financial are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Regions Financial reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Berkshire Hills Bancorp 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

8 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
OK
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Berkshire Hills Bancorp are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite somewhat unsteady essential indicators, Berkshire Hills sustained solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Regions Financial and Berkshire Hills Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Regions Financial and Berkshire Hills

The main advantage of trading using opposite Regions Financial and Berkshire Hills positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Regions Financial position performs unexpectedly, Berkshire Hills can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Berkshire Hills will offset losses from the drop in Berkshire Hills' long position.
The idea behind Regions Financial and Berkshire Hills Bancorp pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Theme Ratings module to determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.

Other Complementary Tools

Pair Correlation
Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments
Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Commodity Channel
Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world