Correlation Between Strategic Allocation and Income Growth

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Strategic Allocation and Income Growth at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Strategic Allocation and Income Growth into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between Strategic Allocation Moderate and Income Growth Fund, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Strategic Allocation and Income Growth and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Strategic Allocation with a short position of Income Growth. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Strategic Allocation and Income Growth.

Diversification Opportunities for Strategic Allocation and Income Growth

0.92

Correlation Coefficient

Strategic Allocation  Income Growth

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Strategic and Income is 0.92. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Strategic Allocation Moderate and Income Growth Fund in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Income Growth and Strategic Allocation is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Strategic Allocation Moderate are associated (or correlated) with Income Growth. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Income Growth has no effect on the direction of Strategic Allocation i.e., Strategic Allocation and Income Growth go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Strategic Allocation and Income Growth

Assuming the 90 days horizon Strategic Allocation is expected to generate 1.55 times less return on investment than Income Growth. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Strategic Allocation Moderate is 1.61 times less risky than Income Growth. It trades about 0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Income Growth Fund is currently generating about 0.16 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  3,666  in Income Growth Fund on August 31, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  261.00  from holding Income Growth Fund or generate 7.12% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Together
Strength	Very Strong
Accuracy	100.0%
Values	Daily Returns

Strategic Allocation Moderate  vs.  Income Growth Fund

Strategic Allocation

Risk-Adjusted Performance

13 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Strategic Allocation Moderate are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong primary indicators, Strategic Allocation is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Income Growth

Risk-Adjusted Performance

12 of 100

Good

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Income Growth Fund are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Income Growth may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in December 2024.

Pair Trading with Strategic Allocation and Income Growth

The main advantage of trading using opposite Strategic Allocation and Income Growth positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Strategic Allocation position performs unexpectedly, Income Growth can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Income Growth will offset losses from the drop in Income Growth's long position.

The idea behind Strategic Allocation Moderate and Income Growth Fund pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the FinTech Suite module to use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities.