Correlation Between CONOCOPHILLIPS and Dine Brands

Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both CONOCOPHILLIPS and Dine Brands at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining CONOCOPHILLIPS and Dine Brands into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.

By analyzing existing cross correlation between CONOCOPHILLIPS CDA FDG and Dine Brands Global, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on CONOCOPHILLIPS and Dine Brands and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in CONOCOPHILLIPS with a short position of Dine Brands. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of CONOCOPHILLIPS and Dine Brands.

Diversification Opportunities for CONOCOPHILLIPS and Dine Brands

-0.08

Correlation Coefficient

CONOCOPHILLIPS  Dine Brands

Good diversification

The 3 months correlation between CONOCOPHILLIPS and Dine is -0.08. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding CONOCOPHILLIPS CDA FDG and Dine Brands Global in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Dine Brands Global and CONOCOPHILLIPS is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on CONOCOPHILLIPS CDA FDG are associated (or correlated) with Dine Brands. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Dine Brands Global has no effect on the direction of CONOCOPHILLIPS i.e., CONOCOPHILLIPS and Dine Brands go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between CONOCOPHILLIPS and Dine Brands

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon CONOCOPHILLIPS CDA FDG is expected to under-perform the Dine Brands. But the bond apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, CONOCOPHILLIPS CDA FDG is 3.78 times less risky than Dine Brands. The bond trades about -0.13 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Dine Brands Global is currently generating about 0.04 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  2,969  in Dine Brands Global on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would earn a total of  191.00  from holding Dine Brands Global or generate 6.43% return on investment over 90 days.

Time Period	3 Months [change]
Direction	Moves Against
Strength	Insignificant
Accuracy	50.79%
Values	Daily Returns

CONOCOPHILLIPS CDA FDG  vs.  Dine Brands Global

CONOCOPHILLIPS CDA FDG

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

Very Weak

Over the last 90 days CONOCOPHILLIPS CDA FDG has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest unfluctuating performance, the Bond's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for CONOCOPHILLIPS CDA FDG investors.

Dine Brands Global

Risk-Adjusted Performance

3 of 100

Insignificant

Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Dine Brands Global are ranked lower than 3 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of very unfluctuating forward indicators, Dine Brands may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2025.

Pair Trading with CONOCOPHILLIPS and Dine Brands

The main advantage of trading using opposite CONOCOPHILLIPS and Dine Brands positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if CONOCOPHILLIPS position performs unexpectedly, Dine Brands can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Dine Brands will offset losses from the drop in Dine Brands' long position.

The idea behind CONOCOPHILLIPS CDA FDG and Dine Brands Global pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.

Check out your portfolio center.

Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the My Watchlist Analysis module to analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like.