Correlation Between Vera Bradley and Aspen Insurance

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Vera Bradley and Aspen Insurance at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Vera Bradley and Aspen Insurance into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Vera Bradley and Aspen Insurance Holdings, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Vera Bradley and Aspen Insurance and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Vera Bradley with a short position of Aspen Insurance. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Vera Bradley and Aspen Insurance.

Diversification Opportunities for Vera Bradley and Aspen Insurance

0.37
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Vera and Aspen is 0.37. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Vera Bradley and Aspen Insurance Holdings in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Aspen Insurance Holdings and Vera Bradley is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Vera Bradley are associated (or correlated) with Aspen Insurance. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Aspen Insurance Holdings has no effect on the direction of Vera Bradley i.e., Vera Bradley and Aspen Insurance go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Vera Bradley and Aspen Insurance

Considering the 90-day investment horizon Vera Bradley is expected to under-perform the Aspen Insurance. In addition to that, Vera Bradley is 2.99 times more volatile than Aspen Insurance Holdings. It trades about -0.18 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Aspen Insurance Holdings is currently generating about -0.05 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  2,196  in Aspen Insurance Holdings on September 14, 2024 and sell it today you would lose (36.00) from holding Aspen Insurance Holdings or give up 1.64% of portfolio value over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Vera Bradley  vs.  Aspen Insurance Holdings

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Vera Bradley 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Vera Bradley has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. Despite latest weak performance, the Stock's basic indicators remain strong and the current disturbance on Wall Street may also be a sign of long term gains for the company investors.
Aspen Insurance Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

0 of 100

 
Weak
 
Strong
Very Weak
Over the last 90 days Aspen Insurance Holdings has generated negative risk-adjusted returns adding no value to investors with long positions. In spite of rather sound essential indicators, Aspen Insurance is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.

Vera Bradley and Aspen Insurance Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Vera Bradley and Aspen Insurance

The main advantage of trading using opposite Vera Bradley and Aspen Insurance positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Vera Bradley position performs unexpectedly, Aspen Insurance can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Aspen Insurance will offset losses from the drop in Aspen Insurance's long position.
The idea behind Vera Bradley and Aspen Insurance Holdings pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the ETF Categories module to list of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments.

Other Complementary Tools

Risk-Return Analysis
View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas
Performance Analysis
Check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation
Price Exposure Probability
Analyze equity upside and downside potential for a given time horizon across multiple markets
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data