Design Co Stock Book Value Per Share
| 227100 Stock | KRW 698.00 89.00 14.61% |
Design Co fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Design's financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Design Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Design's intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Design stock.
Design |
Design Co Company Book Value Per Share Analysis
Design's Book Value per Share (B/S) can be calculated by subtracting liabilities from assets, and then dividing it by the total number of currently outstanding shares. It indicates the level of safety associated with each common share after removing the effects of liabilities. In other words, a shareholder can use this ratio to see how much he or she can sell the stake in the company in the event of a liquidation.
More About Book Value Per Share | All Equity Analysis
Book Value per Share | = | Common EquityAverage Shares |
The naive approach to look at Book Value per Share is to compare it to current stock price. If Book Value per Share is higher than the currently traded stock price, the company can be considered undervalued. However, investors must be aware that conventional calculation of Book Value does not include intangible assets such as goodwill, intellectual property, trademarks or brands and may not be an appropriate measure for many firms.
| Competition |
In accordance with the recently published financial statements, the book value per share of Design Co is about 0.0 times. This indicator is about the same for the average (which is currently at 0.0) sector and about the same as Machinery, Tools, Heavy Vehicles, Trains & Ships (which currently averages 0.0) industry. This indicator is about the same for all Republic of Korea stocks average (which is currently at 0.0).
Did you try this?
Run Equity Valuation Now
Equity ValuationCheck real value of public entities based on technical and fundamental data |
| All Next | Launch Module |
Design Fundamentals
| Return On Equity | -37.29 | |||
| Return On Asset | -0.16 | |||
| Profit Margin | (0.40) % | |||
| Operating Margin | (0.15) % | |||
| Current Valuation | 68.29 B | |||
| Shares Outstanding | 2.66 M | |||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 25.14 % | |||
| Price To Sales | 0.60 X | |||
| Revenue | 13.23 B | |||
| Gross Profit | 3.28 B | |||
| EBITDA | (4.2 B) | |||
| Net Income | (19.5 B) | |||
| Cash And Equivalents | 36.27 B | |||
| Cash Per Share | 509.60 X | |||
| Total Debt | 3.62 B | |||
| Debt To Equity | 4.72 % | |||
| Current Ratio | 0.97 X | |||
| Cash Flow From Operations | (104.17 M) | |||
| Number Of Employees | 53 | |||
| Beta | 1.57 | |||
| Market Capitalization | 10.02 B | |||
| Total Asset | 65 B | |||
| Z Score | 1.2 | |||
| Net Asset | 65 B |
About Design Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Design Co's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Design using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Design Co based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.
Pair Trading with Design
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Design position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Design will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving against Design Stock
| 0.57 | 025950 | Dongsin Engineering | PairCorr |
| 0.54 | 050960 | SOOSAN INT | PairCorr |
| 0.51 | 045340 | Total Soft Bank | PairCorr |
| 0.37 | 241840 | ASTORY CoLtd | PairCorr |
| 0.37 | 035900 | JYP Entertainment | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Design could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Design when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Design - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Design Co to buy it.
The correlation of Design is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Design moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Design moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Design can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Other Information on Investing in Design Stock
Design financial ratios help investors to determine whether Design Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Design with respect to the benefits of owning Design security.