This module uses fundamental data of Hut 8 to approximate the value of its Beneish M Score. Hut 8 M Score tells investors if the company management is likely to be manipulating earnings. The score is calculated using eight financial indicators that are adjusted by a specific multiplier. Please note, the M Score is a probabilistic model and cannot detect companies that manipulate their earnings with 100% accuracy. Check out Hut 8 Piotroski F Score and Hut 8 Altman Z Score analysis.
Hut
Beneish M Score
Market Cap
Enterprise Value
Price To Sales Ratio
Ptb Ratio
Days Sales Outstanding
Book Value Per Share
Free Cash Flow Yield
Operating Cash Flow Per Share
Average Payables
Stock Based Compensation To Revenue
Capex To Depreciation
Pb Ratio
Ev To Sales
Free Cash Flow Per Share
Roic
Inventory Turnover
Net Income Per Share
Days Of Inventory On Hand
Payables Turnover
Sales General And Administrative To Revenue
Capex To Revenue
Cash Per Share
Pocfratio
Interest Coverage
Capex To Operating Cash Flow
Pfcf Ratio
Days Payables Outstanding
Income Quality
Roe
Ev To Operating Cash Flow
Pe Ratio
Return On Tangible Assets
Ev To Free Cash Flow
Earnings Yield
Intangibles To Total Assets
Net Debt To E B I T D A
Current Ratio
Tangible Book Value Per Share
Receivables Turnover
Graham Number
Shareholders Equity Per Share
Debt To Equity
Capex Per Share
Graham Net Net
Average Receivables
Revenue Per Share
Interest Debt Per Share
Debt To Assets
Enterprise Value Over E B I T D A
Short Term Coverage Ratios
Price Earnings Ratio
Operating Cycle
Price Book Value Ratio
Price Earnings To Growth Ratio
Days Of Payables Outstanding
Price To Operating Cash Flows Ratio
Price To Free Cash Flows Ratio
Pretax Profit Margin
Ebt Per Ebit
Operating Profit Margin
Effective Tax Rate
Company Equity Multiplier
Long Term Debt To Capitalization
Total Debt To Capitalization
Return On Capital Employed
Debt Equity Ratio
Ebit Per Revenue
Quick Ratio
Dividend Paid And Capex Coverage Ratio
Net Income Per E B T
Cash Ratio
Cash Conversion Cycle
Operating Cash Flow Sales Ratio
Days Of Inventory Outstanding
Days Of Sales Outstanding
Free Cash Flow Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Cash Flow Coverage Ratios
Price To Book Ratio
Fixed Asset Turnover
Capital Expenditure Coverage Ratio
Price Cash Flow Ratio
Enterprise Value Multiple
Debt Ratio
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio
Price Sales Ratio
Return On Assets
Asset Turnover
Net Profit Margin
Gross Profit Margin
Price Fair Value
Return On Equity
Change In Cash
Begin Period Cash Flow
Other Cashflows From Financing Activities
Capital Expenditures
Total Cash From Financing Activities
End Period Cash Flow
Stock Based Compensation
Free Cash Flow
Change In Working Capital
Total Cash From Operating Activities
Change To Account Receivables
Net Income
Other Non Cash Items
Net Borrowings
Total Cashflows From Investing Activities
Depreciation
Change To Operating Activities
Other Cashflows From Investing Activities
Change To Netincome
Change To Liabilities
Investments
Issuance Of Capital Stock
Change To Inventory
Total Assets
Total Stockholder Equity
Net Debt
Cash
Non Current Assets Total
Non Currrent Assets Other
Cash And Short Term Investments
Total Current Assets
Common Stock
Common Stock Total Equity
Common Stock Shares Outstanding
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity
Total Liab
Other Current Liab
Total Current Liabilities
Retained Earnings
Net Receivables
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Non Current Liabilities Total
Other Stockholder Equity
Net Invested Capital
Net Working Capital
Net Tangible Assets
Accounts Payable
Other Assets
Property Plant Equipment
Short Long Term Debt Total
Property Plant And Equipment Net
Long Term Debt
Other Current Assets
Property Plant And Equipment Gross
Short Long Term Debt
Capital Stock
Short Term Debt
Intangible Assets
Inventory
Short Term Investments
Capital Lease Obligations
Depreciation And Amortization
Interest Expense
Selling General Administrative
Other Operating Expenses
Operating Income
Ebit
Ebitda
Total Operating Expenses
Income Before Tax
Total Other Income Expense Net
Total Revenue
Net Income From Continuing Ops
Net Income Applicable To Common Shares
Income Tax Expense
Tax Provision
Net Interest Income
Interest Income
Gross Profit
Cost Of Revenue
Reconciled Depreciation
Probability Of Bankruptcy
At this time, Hut 8's Total Debt To Capitalization is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Debt Equity Ratio is likely to gain to 0.44 in 2024, whereas Debt Ratio is likely to drop 0.25 in 2024. At this time, Hut 8's ROE is comparatively stable compared to the past year. PE Ratio is likely to gain to 45.62 in 2024, whereas Free Cash Flow Yield is likely to drop (0.04) in 2024.
At this time, it appears that Hut 8 Corp is an unlikely manipulator. The earnings manipulation may begin if Hut 8's top management creates an artificial sense of financial success, forcing the stock price to be traded at a high price-earnings multiple than it should be. In general, excessive earnings management by Hut 8 executives may lead to removing some of the operating profits from subsequent periods to inflate earnings in the following periods. This way, the manipulation of Hut 8's earnings can lead to misrepresentations of actual financial condition, taking the otherwise loyal stakeholders on to the path of questionable ethical practices and plain fraud.
The cure to earnings manipulation is the transparency of financial reporting. It will typically remove the temptation of the top executives to inflate earnings (i.e., to promote the idea of 'winning at any cost'). Because a healthy internal audit department can enhance transparency, the board should promote the auditors' access to all the record-keeping systems across the enterprise. For example, if Hut 8's auditors report directly to the board (not management), the managers will be reluctant to manipulate simply due to the fear of punishment. On the other hand, the auditors will be free to investigate the ledgers properly because they know that the board has their back.
One of the toughest challenges investors face today is learning how to quickly synthesize historical financial statements and information provided by the company, SEC reporting, and various external parties in order to detect the potential manipulation of earnings. Understanding the correlation between Hut 8's different financial indicators related to revenue, expenses, operating profit, and net earnings helps investors identify and prioritize their investing strategies towards Hut 8 in a much-optimized way. Analyzing correlations between earnings drivers directly associated with dollar figures is the most effective way to find Hut 8's degree of accounting gimmicks and manipulations.
M-Score is one of many grading techniques for value stocks. It was developed by Professor M. Daniel Beneish of the Kelley School of Business at Indiana University and published in 1999 under the paper titled The Detection of Earnings Manipulation. The Beneish score is a multi-factor model that utilizes financial identifiers to compile eight variables used to classify whether a company has manipulated its reported earnings. The variables are built from the officially filed financial statements to create a final score call 'M Score.' The score helps to identify companies that are likely to manipulate their profits if they show deteriorating gross margins, operating expenses, and leverage against growing revenue.
Other Operating Expenses
63.7 Million
At this time, Hut 8's Other Operating Expenses is comparatively stable compared to the past year.
Hut 8 Earnings Manipulation Drivers
Although earnings manipulation is typically not the result of intentional misconduct by the c-level executives, it is still a widespread practice by the senior management of public companies such as Hut 8. It is usually done by a series of misrepresentations of various accounting rules and operating activities across multiple financial cycles. The best way to spot the manipulation is to examine the historical financial statement to find inconsistencies in earning reports to find trends in assets or liabilities that are not sustainable in the future.
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Hut 8 Corp's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Hut 8 using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Hut 8 Corp based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Build portfolios using Macroaxis predefined set of investing ideas. Many of Macroaxis investing ideas can easily outperform a given market. Ideas can also be optimized per your risk profile before portfolio origination is invoked. Macroaxis thematic optimization helps investors identify companies most likely to benefit from changes or shifts in various micro-economic or local macro-level trends. Originating optimal thematic portfolios involves aligning investors' personal views, ideas, and beliefs with their actual investments.
When running Hut 8's price analysis, check to measure Hut 8's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Hut 8 is operating at the current time. Most of Hut 8's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Hut 8's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Hut 8's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Hut 8 to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.