Restaurant Brands International Stock Current Asset

QSP-UN Stock  CAD 98.08  2.14  2.14%   
Restaurant Brands International fundamentals help investors to digest information that contributes to Restaurant Brands' financial success or failures. It also enables traders to predict the movement of Restaurant Stock. The fundamental analysis module provides a way to measure Restaurant Brands' intrinsic value by examining its available economic and financial indicators, including the cash flow records, the balance sheet account changes, the income statement patterns, and various microeconomic indicators and financial ratios related to Restaurant Brands stock.
As of December 12, 2024, Non Current Assets Total is expected to decline to about 18.7 B. In addition to that, Other Current Assets is expected to decline to about 68.8 M.
  
This module does not cover all equities due to inconsistencies in global equity categorizations. Continue to Equity Screeners to view more equity screening tools.

Restaurant Brands International Company Current Asset Analysis

Restaurant Brands' Current Asset is all of the company's assets that can be used to pay off current liabilities within the current fiscal period or over the next 12 months. Current Asset includes cash or cash equivalents, accounts receivable, short-term investments, and the portion of prepaid liabilities which will be paid within the next 12 months. Because these assets are easily turned into cash, they are sometimes referred to as liquid assets.

Current Asset

 = 

Cash

+

Deposits

+

Liquid Assets

More About Current Asset | All Equity Analysis

Restaurant Current Asset Driver Correlations

Understanding the fundamental principles of building solid financial models for Restaurant Brands is extremely important. It helps to project a fair market value of Restaurant Stock properly, considering its historical fundamentals such as Current Asset. Since Restaurant Brands' main accounts across its financial reports are all linked and dependent on each other, it is essential to analyze all possible correlations between related accounts. However, instead of reviewing all of Restaurant Brands' historical financial statements, investors can examine the correlated drivers to determine its overall health. This can be effectively done using a conventional correlation matrix of Restaurant Brands' interrelated accounts and indicators.
Current Asset is important to company's creditors and private equity firms as they will often be interested in how much that company has in current assets since these assets can be easily liquidated in case the company goes bankrupt. However, it is usually not enough to know if a company is in good shape just based on current asset alone; the amount of current liabilities should always be considered.
Competition

Restaurant Total Assets

Total Assets

20.73 Billion

At present, Restaurant Brands' Total Assets are projected to increase significantly based on the last few years of reporting.
In accordance with the recently published financial statements, Restaurant Brands International has a Current Asset of 0.0. This is 100.0% lower than that of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure sector and 100.0% lower than that of the Consumer Discretionary industry. The current asset for all Canada stocks is 100.0% higher than that of the company.

Did you try this?

Run Insider Screener Now

   

Insider Screener

Find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance
All  Next Launch Module

Restaurant Fundamentals

About Restaurant Brands Fundamental Analysis

The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Restaurant Brands International's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Restaurant Brands using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at the intrinsic value of Restaurant Brands International based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Please read more on our fundamental analysis page.

Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Restaurant Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Restaurant Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Restaurant Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Restaurant Brands International to buy it.
The correlation of Restaurant Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Restaurant Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Restaurant Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Restaurant Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching
When determining whether Restaurant Brands is a strong investment it is important to analyze Restaurant Brands' competitive position within its industry, examining market share, product or service uniqueness, and competitive advantages. Beyond financials and market position, potential investors should also consider broader economic conditions, industry trends, and any regulatory or geopolitical factors that may impact Restaurant Brands' future performance. For an informed investment choice regarding Restaurant Stock, refer to the following important reports:
Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Restaurant Brands International. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in employment.
You can also try the Positions Ratings module to determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Restaurant Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Restaurant Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Restaurant Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.