Interactive Net Tangible Assets vs Net Debt Analysis
IBKR Stock | USD 191.09 0.03 0.02% |
Interactive Brokers financial indicator trend analysis is infinitely more than just investigating Interactive Brokers recent accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether Interactive Brokers is a good investment. Please check the relationship between Interactive Brokers Net Tangible Assets and its Net Debt accounts. Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Interactive Brokers Group. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in industry.
Net Tangible Assets vs Net Debt
Net Tangible Assets vs Net Debt Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of Interactive Brokers Net Tangible Assets account and Net Debt. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have very strong relationship.
The correlation between Interactive Brokers' Net Tangible Assets and Net Debt is 0.81. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Net Tangible Assets that can explain the historical movement of Net Debt in the same time period over historical financial statements of Interactive Brokers Group, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of Interactive Brokers' Net Tangible Assets and Net Debt is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Net Tangible Assets of Interactive Brokers Group are associated (or correlated) with its Net Debt. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Net Debt has no effect on the direction of Net Tangible Assets i.e., Interactive Brokers' Net Tangible Assets and Net Debt go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | 0.81 |
Relationship Direction | Positive |
Relationship Strength | Strong |
Net Tangible Assets
The total assets of a company minus any intangible assets such as patents, copyrights, and goodwill; it represents the physical assets of a company.Net Debt
The total debt of a company minus its cash and cash equivalents. It represents the actual debt burden on the company after accounting for the liquid assets it holds.Most indicators from Interactive Brokers' fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into Interactive Brokers current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Risk vs Return Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Interactive Brokers Group. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in industry. At this time, Interactive Brokers' Enterprise Value Over EBITDA is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 12/02/2024, Enterprise Value Multiple is likely to grow to 2.57, while Tax Provision is likely to drop slightly above 139.5 M.
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Interest Expense | 224M | 1.0B | 3.4B | 3.6B | Depreciation And Amortization | 74M | 84M | 94M | 183.9M |
Interactive Brokers fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Interactive Brokers Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Interactive Brokers fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 76.8M | 80.6M | 95.0M | 101.3M | 105.8M | 147.7M | |
Total Assets | 71.7B | 95.7B | 108.9B | 115.1B | 128.4B | 134.8B | |
Short Long Term Debt Total | 16M | 10.0B | 11.8B | 9.0B | 11.4B | 11.9B | |
Other Current Liab | 56.7B | (76.4B) | (86.7B) | (94.0B) | (113.7B) | (108.0B) | |
Total Current Liabilities | 57.0B | 76.7B | 86.8B | 94.4B | 114.2B | 119.9B | |
Total Stockholder Equity | 1.5B | 2.0B | 2.4B | 2.8B | 3.6B | 1.9B | |
Other Liab | 156M | 503M | 556M | 223M | 256.5M | 316.3M | |
Net Debt | (2.9B) | 5.7B | 9.3B | 5.5B | 7.6B | 8.0B | |
Accounts Payable | 220M | 76.4B | 86.7B | 94.0B | 102.3B | 107.4B | |
Cash | 2.9B | 4.3B | 2.4B | 3.4B | 3.8B | 2.1B | |
Non Current Assets Total | 2.2B | 2.1B | 9.8B | 12.5B | 124.7B | 130.9B | |
Non Currrent Assets Other | 480M | 698M | 431M | 814M | 111.5B | 117.0B | |
Other Assets | 194M | 91.3B | 109.1B | 486M | (110.8B) | (116.3B) | |
Long Term Debt | 6.3B | 9.8B | 11.8B | 8.9B | 11.3B | 11.9B | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 2.9B | 4.3B | 2.4B | 3.4B | 3.8B | 3.0B | |
Net Receivables | 32.0B | 40.7B | 58.8B | 42.6B | 46.5B | 48.8B | |
Short Term Investments | 3.9B | 5.0B | 3.9B | (6.0B) | 5.8B | 5.5B | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 71.7B | 95.7B | 108.9B | 115.1B | 128.4B | 134.8B | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 6.8B | 10.0B | 12.0B | 9.1B | 114.4B | 120.1B | |
Inventory | 100.7B | 142.4B | 141.2B | (4.8B) | (5.6B) | (5.3B) | |
Other Stockholder Equity | (7.5B) | 1.2B | 1.4B | 1.6B | 1.7B | 987.5M | |
Total Liab | 63.7B | 86.7B | 98.7B | 103.5B | 114.4B | 120.1B | |
Total Current Assets | 69.4B | 93.6B | 99.1B | 102.6B | 114.5B | 108.8B | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | 7.9B | 26M | 4M | (22M) | 8M | 7.6M | |
Short Term Debt | 16M | 118M | 27M | 18M | 11.4B | 12.0B | |
Property Plant Equipment | 180M | 168M | 186M | 212M | 243.8M | 256.0M | |
Retained Earnings | 520M | 683M | 953M | 1.3B | 1.9B | 1.9B | |
Net Tangible Assets | 1.5B | 2.0B | 2.4B | 2.8B | 3.3B | 3.4B | |
Noncontrolling Interest In Consolidated Entity | 6.5B | 7.1B | 7.8B | 8.8B | 10.1B | 5.3B | |
Good Will | 132M | 190M | 209M | 193M | 197M | 206.9M | |
Retained Earnings Total Equity | 520M | 683M | 953M | 1.3B | 1.5B | 1.6B | |
Capital Surpluse | 934M | 1.2B | 1.4B | 1.6B | 1.8B | 1.0B | |
Other Current Assets | (66.2B) | 43.8B | 38.1B | 57.0B | 64.3B | 67.5B | |
Long Term Investments | 1.9B | 630M | 9.0B | 5.2B | 12.8B | 13.4B | |
Non Current Liabilities Other | 2.4B | 153M | 12.0B | 146M | 11.3B | 11.9B | |
Intangible Assets | 34M | 37M | 46M | 48M | 43M | 23.9M |
Pair Trading with Interactive Brokers
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Interactive Brokers position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Interactive Brokers will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Interactive Stock
0.85 | V | Visa Class A | PairCorr |
0.79 | DHIL | Diamond Hill Investment | PairCorr |
0.94 | DIST | Distoken Acquisition | PairCorr |
0.68 | AB | AllianceBernstein | PairCorr |
0.75 | AC | Associated Capital | PairCorr |
Moving against Interactive Stock
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Interactive Brokers could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Interactive Brokers when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Interactive Brokers - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Interactive Brokers Group to buy it.
The correlation of Interactive Brokers is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Interactive Brokers moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Interactive Brokers moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Interactive Brokers can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Interactive Stock Analysis
When running Interactive Brokers' price analysis, check to measure Interactive Brokers' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Interactive Brokers is operating at the current time. Most of Interactive Brokers' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Interactive Brokers' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Interactive Brokers' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Interactive Brokers to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.