Monolithic Total Liab vs Good Will Analysis
MPWR Stock | USD 560.24 11.84 2.07% |
Monolithic Power financial indicator trend analysis is infinitely more than just investigating Monolithic Power Systems recent accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether Monolithic Power Systems is a good investment. Please check the relationship between Monolithic Power Total Liab and its Good Will accounts. Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Monolithic Power Systems. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in housing.
Total Liab vs Good Will
Total Liab vs Good Will Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of Monolithic Power Systems Total Liab account and Good Will. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have fragmental relationship.
The correlation between Monolithic Power's Total Liab and Good Will is 0.59. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Total Liab that can explain the historical movement of Good Will in the same time period over historical financial statements of Monolithic Power Systems, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of Monolithic Power's Total Liab and Good Will is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Total Liab of Monolithic Power Systems are associated (or correlated) with its Good Will. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Good Will has no effect on the direction of Total Liab i.e., Monolithic Power's Total Liab and Good Will go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | 0.59 |
Relationship Direction | Positive |
Relationship Strength | Weak |
Total Liab
The total amount of all liabilities that a company has, including both short-term and long-term liabilities.Good Will
An intangible asset that arises when a company acquires another business for more than the fair market value of its net identifiable assets, representing the value of the brand, customer base, and other intangible factors.Most indicators from Monolithic Power's fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into Monolithic Power Systems current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Correlation Analysis to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Monolithic Power Systems. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in housing. At this time, Monolithic Power's Selling General Administrative is relatively stable compared to the past year. As of 11/28/2024, Tax Provision is likely to grow to about 81.4 M, while Enterprise Value Over EBITDA is likely to drop 35.47.
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Gross Profit | 685.5M | 1.0B | 1.0B | 1.1B | Total Revenue | 1.2B | 1.8B | 1.8B | 1.9B |
Monolithic Power fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Monolithic Power Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Monolithic Power fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 45.8M | 47.0M | 47.9M | 48.4M | 48.8M | 35.2M | |
Total Assets | 956.4M | 1.2B | 1.6B | 2.1B | 2.4B | 2.6B | |
Total Stockholder Equity | 773.5M | 966.6M | 1.2B | 1.7B | 2.0B | 2.2B | |
Net Debt | (170.6M) | (331.8M) | (183.5M) | (284.8M) | (522.3M) | (496.2M) | |
Cash | 173.0M | 334.9M | 189.3M | 288.6M | 527.8M | 554.2M | |
Other Assets | 60.3M | 101.4M | 91.4M | 273.1M | 1.0 | 0.95 | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 455.4M | 595.1M | 725.1M | 737.9M | 1.1B | 1.2B | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 956.4M | 1.2B | 1.6B | 2.1B | 2.4B | 2.6B | |
Other Stockholder Equity | (476K) | 10.1M | 15.9M | (23.1M) | (1.0) | (0.95) | |
Total Liab | 182.9M | 241.9M | 341.8M | 390.3M | 384.4M | 403.6M | |
Total Current Assets | 655.2M | 842.0M | 1.1B | 1.4B | 1.8B | 1.9B | |
Other Current Liab | 66.3M | 103.6M | 93.7M | 186.3M | 164.0M | 172.2M | |
Total Current Liabilities | 98.2M | 147.0M | 226.9M | 263.4M | 235.0M | 246.8M | |
Other Liab | 83.6M | 94.9M | 114.9M | 125.2M | 144.0M | 151.2M | |
Property Plant And Equipment Net | 228.3M | 281.5M | 363.0M | 357.2M | 377.3M | 396.2M | |
Retained Earnings | 229.5M | 298.7M | 424.9M | 716.4M | 947.1M | 994.4M | |
Accounts Payable | 27.3M | 38.2M | 83.0M | 61.5M | 63.0M | 66.1M | |
Non Current Assets Total | 301.2M | 366.5M | 461.0M | 648.3M | 614.9M | 645.6M | |
Non Currrent Assets Other | 46.0M | 53.6M | 13.8M | 184.4M | 202.2M | 212.3M | |
Net Receivables | 52.7M | 66.8M | 104.8M | 182.7M | 250.0M | 262.5M | |
Common Stock Total Equity | 549.5M | 657.7M | 803.2M | 975.3M | 1.1B | 1.2B | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 84.7M | 94.9M | 114.9M | 126.9M | 149.4M | 156.8M | |
Inventory | 127.5M | 157.1M | 259.4M | 447.3M | 383.7M | 402.9M | |
Other Current Assets | 19.6M | 23.0M | 35.5M | 42.7M | 77.3M | 81.2M | |
Property Plant And Equipment Gross | 231.2M | 285.2M | 363.0M | 551.3M | 598.4M | 628.3M | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | (5.5M) | 10.1M | 15.9M | (23.1M) | (27.1M) | (25.7M) | |
Common Stock | 549.5M | 657.7M | 803.2M | 975.3M | 1.1B | 1.2B | |
Property Plant Equipment | 228.3M | 281.5M | 363.0M | 357.2M | 410.7M | 431.3M | |
Short Term Investments | 282.4M | 260.2M | 535.8M | 449.3M | 580.6M | 609.7M | |
Current Deferred Revenue | 3.4M | 7.2M | 4.3M | (2.1M) | 65.8M | 69.0M | |
Net Tangible Assets | 766.9M | 966.6M | 1.2B | 1.7B | 1.9B | 2.0B | |
Retained Earnings Total Equity | 229.5M | 298.7M | 424.9M | 716.4M | 823.9M | 865.1M | |
Long Term Investments | 5.3M | 3.2M | 3.1M | 6.3M | 5.6M | 5.5M | |
Non Current Liabilities Other | 37.6M | 94.9M | 114.9M | 73.4M | 2.2M | 2.1M | |
Net Invested Capital | 773.5M | 966.6M | 1.2B | 1.7B | 2.0B | 1.2B | |
Net Working Capital | 557.0M | 695.0M | 897.9M | 1.1B | 1.6B | 906.0M | |
Capital Stock | 549.5M | 657.7M | 803.2M | 975.3M | 1.1B | 837.2M |
Pair Trading with Monolithic Power
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Monolithic Power position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Monolithic Power will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Monolithic Stock
Moving against Monolithic Stock
0.82 | EBON | Ebang International | PairCorr |
0.73 | AMZN | Amazon Inc Aggressive Push | PairCorr |
0.69 | KSCP | Knightscope | PairCorr |
0.68 | NTGR | NETGEAR | PairCorr |
0.64 | CSCO | Cisco Systems Aggressive Push | PairCorr |
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Monolithic Power could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Monolithic Power when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Monolithic Power - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Monolithic Power Systems to buy it.
The correlation of Monolithic Power is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Monolithic Power moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Monolithic Power Systems moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Monolithic Power can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Additional Tools for Monolithic Stock Analysis
When running Monolithic Power's price analysis, check to measure Monolithic Power's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Monolithic Power is operating at the current time. Most of Monolithic Power's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Monolithic Power's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Monolithic Power's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Monolithic Power to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.