Restaurant Long Term Debt vs Total Revenue Analysis
QSP-UN Stock | CAD 100.22 2.91 2.99% |
Restaurant Brands financial indicator trend analysis is much more than just breaking down Restaurant Brands prevalent accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether Restaurant Brands is a good investment. Please check the relationship between Restaurant Brands Long Term Debt and its Total Revenue accounts. Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Restaurant Brands International. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in employment.
Long Term Debt vs Total Revenue
Long Term Debt vs Total Revenue Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of Restaurant Brands Long Term Debt account and Total Revenue. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have very strong relationship.
The correlation between Restaurant Brands' Long Term Debt and Total Revenue is 0.87. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Long Term Debt that can explain the historical movement of Total Revenue in the same time period over historical financial statements of Restaurant Brands International, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of Restaurant Brands' Long Term Debt and Total Revenue is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Long Term Debt of Restaurant Brands International are associated (or correlated) with its Total Revenue. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Total Revenue has no effect on the direction of Long Term Debt i.e., Restaurant Brands' Long Term Debt and Total Revenue go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | 0.87 |
Relationship Direction | Positive |
Relationship Strength | Strong |
Long Term Debt
Long-term debt is a debt that Restaurant Brands has held for over one year. Long-term debt appears on Restaurant Brands International balance sheet and also includes long-term leases. The most common forms of long term debt are bonds payable, long-term notes payable, mortgage payable, pension liabilities, and lease liabilities. In the corporate world, long-term debt is generally used to fund big-ticket items, such as machinery, buildings, and land. The total of long-term debt reported on Restaurant Brands International balance sheet is the sum of the balances of all categories of long-term debt. Debt that is not due within the current year and is often considered to be financing activities that are to be repaid over several years.Total Revenue
Total revenue comprises all receipts Restaurant Brands generated from the sale of its products or services. The total amount of income generated by the sale of goods or services related to the company's primary operations.Most indicators from Restaurant Brands' fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into Restaurant Brands current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Restaurant Brands International. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in employment. At present, Restaurant Brands' Sales General And Administrative To Revenue is projected to increase slightly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Enterprise Value Over EBITDA is expected to grow to 18.25, whereas Selling General Administrative is forecasted to decline to about 617.8 M.
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Interest Expense | 505M | 533M | 595M | 489.1M | Depreciation And Amortization | 201M | 190M | 191M | 176M |
Restaurant Brands fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Restaurant Brands Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Restaurant Brands fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Total Assets | 22.4B | 22.8B | 23.2B | 22.7B | 23.4B | 20.7B | |
Other Current Liab | 790M | 835M | 947M | 1.0B | 781M | 727.8M | |
Total Current Liabilities | 1.7B | 1.6B | 1.9B | 2.1B | 2.1B | 1.6B | |
Total Stockholder Equity | 2.5B | 2.2B | 2.2B | 2.5B | 2.9B | 2.2B | |
Net Debt | 11.7B | 12.3B | 13.3B | 13.1B | 13.4B | 10.2B | |
Retained Earnings | 775M | 622M | 791M | 1.1B | 1.6B | 1.7B | |
Accounts Payable | 644M | 464M | 614M | 758M | 790M | 481.3M | |
Cash | 1.5B | 1.6B | 1.1B | 1.2B | 1.1B | 1.3B | |
Non Current Assets Total | 20.2B | 20.5B | 21.4B | 20.7B | 21.2B | 18.7B | |
Non Currrent Assets Other | 767M | 890M | 842M | 987M | 1.3B | 1.3B | |
Other Assets | 494M | 685M | 648M | 820M | 943M | 693.3M | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 1.5B | 1.6B | 1.1B | 1.2B | 1.1B | 1.3B | |
Net Receivables | 527M | 536M | 547M | 614M | 749M | 504.5M | |
Good Will | 5.7B | 5.7B | 6.0B | 5.7B | 5.8B | 5.1B | |
Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 469M | 468M | 464M | 455M | 456M | 483.8M | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 16.4B | 17.5B | 17.5B | 16.4B | 16.5B | 14.2B | |
Inventory | 75M | 84M | 96M | 133M | 166M | 95.2M | |
Other Current Assets | 52M | 72M | 86M | 123M | 119M | 68.8M | |
Other Stockholder Equity | (763M) | (854M) | (710M) | (679M) | (611.1M) | (580.5M) | |
Total Liab | 18.1B | 19.1B | 19.4B | 18.5B | 18.7B | 15.9B | |
Total Current Assets | 2.2B | 2.3B | 1.8B | 2.0B | 2.2B | 2.0B | |
Intangible Assets | 10.6B | 10.7B | 11.4B | 11.0B | 11.1B | 10.2B | |
Common Stock | 2.5B | 2.4B | 2.2B | 2.1B | 2.0B | 1.9B | |
Short Long Term Debt Total | 13.2B | 13.9B | 14.4B | 14.3B | 14.5B | 12.5B | |
Current Deferred Revenue | 168M | 191M | 221M | 230M | 325M | 212.4M | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 22.4B | 22.8B | 23.2B | 22.7B | 23.4B | 22.1B | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | (763M) | (854M) | (710M) | (679M) | (706M) | (741.3M) | |
Short Term Debt | 101M | 111M | 96M | 127M | 248M | 160.9M | |
Other Liab | 3.1B | 3.2B | 3.0B | 2.2B | 2.5B | 3.1B | |
Net Tangible Assets | (12.0B) | (12.7B) | (13.6B) | (12.4B) | (11.2B) | (11.7B) | |
Long Term Debt | 11.8B | 12.4B | 12.9B | 12.8B | 12.9B | 12.6B | |
Long Term Investments | 48M | 66M | 80M | 82M | 73.8M | 63.2M | |
Short Long Term Debt | 74M | 111M | 96M | 127M | 101M | 94.0M | |
Capital Lease Obligations | 1.6B | 1.4B | 1.4B | 1.3B | 1.6B | 1.2B | |
Non Current Liabilities Other | 44M | 2.2B | 1.8B | 872M | 24M | 22.8M | |
Net Invested Capital | 16.1B | 16.2B | 15.2B | 15.5B | 17.7B | 17.7B | |
Net Working Capital | 493M | 663M | (62M) | (68M) | 29M | 27.6M |
Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.The ability to find closely correlated positions to Restaurant Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Restaurant Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Restaurant Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Restaurant Brands International to buy it.
The correlation of Restaurant Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Restaurant Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Restaurant Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Restaurant Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Restaurant Brands International. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in employment. You can also try the ETFs module to find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world.