Restaurant Net Debt vs Property Plant Equipment Analysis
QSP-UN Stock | CAD 100.22 2.91 2.99% |
Restaurant Brands financial indicator trend analysis is much more than just breaking down Restaurant Brands prevalent accounting drivers to predict future trends. We encourage investors to analyze account correlations over time for multiple indicators to determine whether Restaurant Brands is a good investment. Please check the relationship between Restaurant Brands Net Debt and its Property Plant Equipment accounts. Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Restaurant Brands International. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in employment.
Net Debt vs Property Plant Equipment
Net Debt vs Property Plant Equipment Correlation Analysis
The overlapping area represents the amount of trend that can be explained by analyzing historical patterns of Restaurant Brands Net Debt account and Property Plant Equipment. At this time, the significance of the direction appears to have strong relationship.
The correlation between Restaurant Brands' Net Debt and Property Plant Equipment is 0.66. Overlapping area represents the amount of variation of Net Debt that can explain the historical movement of Property Plant Equipment in the same time period over historical financial statements of Restaurant Brands International, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical values of Restaurant Brands' Net Debt and Property Plant Equipment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these accounts tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which Net Debt of Restaurant Brands International are associated (or correlated) with its Property Plant Equipment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when Property Plant Equipment has no effect on the direction of Net Debt i.e., Restaurant Brands' Net Debt and Property Plant Equipment go up and down completely randomly.
Correlation Coefficient | 0.66 |
Relationship Direction | Positive |
Relationship Strength | Significant |
Net Debt
The total debt of a company minus its cash and cash equivalents. It represents the actual debt burden on the company after accounting for the liquid assets it holds.Property Plant Equipment
Most indicators from Restaurant Brands' fundamental ratios are interrelated and interconnected. However, analyzing fundamental ratios indicators one by one will only give a small insight into Restaurant Brands current financial condition. On the other hand, looking into the entire matrix of fundamental ratios indicators, and analyzing their relationships over time can provide a more complete picture of the company financial strength now and in the future. Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Restaurant Brands International. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in employment. At present, Restaurant Brands' Sales General And Administrative To Revenue is projected to increase slightly based on the last few years of reporting. The current year's Enterprise Value Over EBITDA is expected to grow to 18.25, whereas Selling General Administrative is forecasted to decline to about 617.8 M.
2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | Interest Expense | 505M | 533M | 595M | 489.1M | Depreciation And Amortization | 201M | 190M | 191M | 176M |
Restaurant Brands fundamental ratios Correlations
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Restaurant Brands Account Relationship Matchups
High Positive Relationship
High Negative Relationship
Restaurant Brands fundamental ratios Accounts
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 (projected) | ||
Total Assets | 22.4B | 22.8B | 23.2B | 22.7B | 23.4B | 20.7B | |
Other Current Liab | 790M | 835M | 947M | 1.0B | 781M | 727.8M | |
Total Current Liabilities | 1.7B | 1.6B | 1.9B | 2.1B | 2.1B | 1.6B | |
Total Stockholder Equity | 2.5B | 2.2B | 2.2B | 2.5B | 2.9B | 2.2B | |
Net Debt | 11.7B | 12.3B | 13.3B | 13.1B | 13.4B | 10.2B | |
Retained Earnings | 775M | 622M | 791M | 1.1B | 1.6B | 1.7B | |
Accounts Payable | 644M | 464M | 614M | 758M | 790M | 481.3M | |
Cash | 1.5B | 1.6B | 1.1B | 1.2B | 1.1B | 1.3B | |
Non Current Assets Total | 20.2B | 20.5B | 21.4B | 20.7B | 21.2B | 18.7B | |
Non Currrent Assets Other | 767M | 890M | 842M | 987M | 1.3B | 1.3B | |
Other Assets | 494M | 685M | 648M | 820M | 943M | 693.3M | |
Cash And Short Term Investments | 1.5B | 1.6B | 1.1B | 1.2B | 1.1B | 1.3B | |
Net Receivables | 527M | 536M | 547M | 614M | 749M | 504.5M | |
Good Will | 5.7B | 5.7B | 6.0B | 5.7B | 5.8B | 5.1B | |
Common Stock Shares Outstanding | 469M | 468M | 464M | 455M | 456M | 483.8M | |
Non Current Liabilities Total | 16.4B | 17.5B | 17.5B | 16.4B | 16.5B | 14.2B | |
Inventory | 75M | 84M | 96M | 133M | 166M | 95.2M | |
Other Current Assets | 52M | 72M | 86M | 123M | 119M | 68.8M | |
Other Stockholder Equity | (763M) | (854M) | (710M) | (679M) | (611.1M) | (580.5M) | |
Total Liab | 18.1B | 19.1B | 19.4B | 18.5B | 18.7B | 15.9B | |
Total Current Assets | 2.2B | 2.3B | 1.8B | 2.0B | 2.2B | 2.0B | |
Intangible Assets | 10.6B | 10.7B | 11.4B | 11.0B | 11.1B | 10.2B | |
Common Stock | 2.5B | 2.4B | 2.2B | 2.1B | 2.0B | 1.9B | |
Short Long Term Debt Total | 13.2B | 13.9B | 14.4B | 14.3B | 14.5B | 12.5B | |
Current Deferred Revenue | 168M | 191M | 221M | 230M | 325M | 212.4M | |
Liabilities And Stockholders Equity | 22.4B | 22.8B | 23.2B | 22.7B | 23.4B | 22.1B | |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | (763M) | (854M) | (710M) | (679M) | (706M) | (741.3M) | |
Short Term Debt | 101M | 111M | 96M | 127M | 248M | 160.9M | |
Other Liab | 3.1B | 3.2B | 3.0B | 2.2B | 2.5B | 3.1B | |
Net Tangible Assets | (12.0B) | (12.7B) | (13.6B) | (12.4B) | (11.2B) | (11.7B) | |
Long Term Debt | 11.8B | 12.4B | 12.9B | 12.8B | 12.9B | 12.6B | |
Long Term Investments | 48M | 66M | 80M | 82M | 73.8M | 63.2M | |
Short Long Term Debt | 74M | 111M | 96M | 127M | 101M | 94.0M | |
Capital Lease Obligations | 1.6B | 1.4B | 1.4B | 1.3B | 1.6B | 1.2B | |
Non Current Liabilities Other | 44M | 2.2B | 1.8B | 872M | 24M | 22.8M | |
Net Invested Capital | 16.1B | 16.2B | 15.2B | 15.5B | 17.7B | 17.7B | |
Net Working Capital | 493M | 663M | (62M) | (68M) | 29M | 27.6M |
Pair Trading with Restaurant Brands
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Restaurant Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Restaurant Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.The ability to find closely correlated positions to Restaurant Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Restaurant Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Restaurant Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Restaurant Brands International to buy it.
The correlation of Restaurant Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Restaurant Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Restaurant Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Restaurant Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Check out Your Equity Center to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Restaurant Brands International. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in employment. You can also try the Portfolio Holdings module to check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing.