AKA Brands EBITDA vs. Price To Book
| AKA Stock | USD 20.55 0.59 2.96% |
EBITDA | First Reported 2010-12-31 | Previous Quarter -66.7 M | Current Value -63.3 M | Quarterly Volatility 46.5 M |
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.62 | 0.5497 |
|
|
For AKA Brands profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of AKA Brands to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well AKA Brands Holding utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between AKA Brands's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of AKA Brands Holding over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
AKA |
Is Specialty Retail space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of AKA Brands. If investors know AKA will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about AKA Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.50) | Earnings Share (2.90) | Revenue Per Share 53.472 | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.064 | Return On Assets (0.02) |
The market value of AKA Brands Holding is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of AKA that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of AKA Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is AKA Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because AKA Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect AKA Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between AKA Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if AKA Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, AKA Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.
AKA Brands Holding Price To Book vs. EBITDA Fundamental Analysis
Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining AKA Brands's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare AKA Brands value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. AKA Brands Holding is rated below average in ebitda category among its peers. It also is rated below average in price to book category among its peers . At present, AKA Brands' EBITDA is projected to decrease significantly based on the last few years of reporting. The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the AKA Brands' earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.AKA Brands' Earnings Breakdown by Geography
AKA Price To Book vs. EBITDA
EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
AKA Brands |
| = | (66.66 M) |
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
Price to Book (P/B) ratio is used to relate a company book value to its current market price. A high P/B ratio indicates that investors expect executives to generate more returns on their investments from a given set of assets. Book value is the accounting value of assets minus liabilities.
AKA Brands |
| = | 1.55 X |
Price to Book ratio is mostly used in financial services industries where assets and liabilities are typically represented by dollars. Although low Price to Book ratio generally implies that the firm is undervalued, it is often a good indicator that the company may be in financial or managerial distress and should be investigated more carefully.
AKA Price To Book Comparison
AKA Brands is currently under evaluation in price to book category among its peers.
AKA Brands Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in AKA Brands, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, AKA Brands will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of AKA Brands' change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of AKA Brands, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -50.3 M | -47.8 M | |
| Net Interest Income | -11.2 M | -10.6 M | |
| Interest Income | 8.1 M | 4.6 M | |
| Operating Income | -83.4 M | -79.2 M | |
| Net Loss | -98.9 M | -93.9 M | |
| Income Before Tax | -97 M | -92.1 M | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -13.6 M | -14.2 M | |
| Net Loss | -159 M | -151.1 M | |
| Net Loss | -98.9 M | -93.9 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | 1.9 M | 1.1 M | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | -1.4 M | -1.4 M | |
| Change To Netincome | 202.9 M | 213.1 M | |
| Net Loss | (9.24) | (9.70) | |
| Income Quality | (0.34) | (0.35) | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 1.02 | 0.70 |
AKA Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on AKA Brands. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of AKA Brands position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the AKA Brands' important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.
Use AKA Brands in pair-trading
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if AKA Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in AKA Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.AKA Brands Pair Trading
AKA Brands Holding Pair Trading Analysis
The ability to find closely correlated positions to AKA Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace AKA Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back AKA Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling AKA Brands Holding to buy it.
The correlation of AKA Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as AKA Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if AKA Brands Holding moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for AKA Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Use Investing Themes to Complement your AKA Brands position
In addition to having AKA Brands in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Communication Thematic Idea Now
Communication
Fama and French investing themes focus on testing asset pricing under different economic assumptions. The Communication theme has 61 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Communication Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Trending Equities. You can also try the Global Markets Map module to get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes.
To fully project AKA Brands' future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of AKA Brands Holding at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include AKA Brands' income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.