Designer Brands Price To Earning vs. EBITDA
| DBI Stock | USD 6.01 0.22 3.80% |
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.3 | 0.317 |
|
| |||||
| Net Profit Margin | 0.0614 | 0.0095 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.097 | 0.0235 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.0981 | 0.0131 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.11 | 0.014 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Equity | 0.15 | 0.0809 |
|
|
For Designer Brands profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Designer Brands to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Designer Brands utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Designer Brands's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Designer Brands over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
Designer |
Is Specialty Retail space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost the valuation of Designer Brands. If investors know Designer will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Designer Brands listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
Quarterly Earnings Growth (0.57) | Earnings Share 0.04 | Revenue Per Share 53.234 | Quarterly Revenue Growth (0.03) | Return On Assets 0.0067 |
The market value of Designer Brands is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Designer that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Designer Brands' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Designer Brands' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Designer Brands' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Designer Brands' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Designer Brands' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Designer Brands is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Designer Brands' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.
Designer Brands EBITDA vs. Price To Earning Fundamental Analysis
Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Designer Brands's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Designer Brands value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. Designer Brands is rated # 5 in price to earning category among its peers. It is rated # 3 in ebitda category among its peers totaling about 19,183,934 of EBITDA per Price To Earning. As of now, Designer Brands' EBITDA is decreasing as compared to previous years. The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the Designer Brands' earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.Designer EBITDA vs. Price To Earning
Price to Earnings ratio is typically used for current valuation of a company and is one of the most popular ratios that investors monitor daily. Holding a low PE stock is less risky because when a company's profitability falls, it is likely that earnings will also go down as well. In other words, if you start from a lower position, your downside risk is limited. There are also some investors who believe that low Price to Earnings ratio reflects the low pricing because a given company is in trouble. On the other hand, a higher PE ratio means that investors are paying more for each unit of profit.
Designer Brands |
| = | 7.22 X |
Generally speaking, the Price to Earnings ratio gives investors an idea of what the market is willing to pay for the company's current earnings.
EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
Designer Brands |
| = | 138.51 M |
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
Designer EBITDA Comparison
Designer Brands is currently under evaluation in ebitda category among its peers.
Designer Brands Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Designer Brands, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Designer Brands will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Designer Brands' change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Designer Brands, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -5.6 M | -5.9 M | |
| Operating Income | 72.4 M | 93.9 M | |
| Income Before Tax | 40.2 M | 70.8 M | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 146.4 M | 153.7 M | |
| Net Income | 29.1 M | 46.8 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | 11 M | 10.4 M | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -32.2 M | -30.6 M | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 29.2 M | 56 M | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | -44.7 M | -42.4 M | |
| Interest Income | 17.1 M | 9.3 M | |
| Net Interest Income | -32.2 M | -30.6 M | |
| Change To Netincome | -4.8 M | -4.6 M | |
| Net Income Per Share | 0.47 | 1.71 | |
| Income Quality | 5.59 | 1.29 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.72 | 0.63 |
Designer Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Designer Brands. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Designer Brands position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Designer Brands' important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.
Use Designer Brands in pair-trading
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Designer Brands position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Designer Brands will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Designer Brands Pair Trading
Designer Brands Pair Trading Analysis
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Designer Brands could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Designer Brands when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Designer Brands - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Designer Brands to buy it.
The correlation of Designer Brands is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Designer Brands moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Designer Brands moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Designer Brands can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Designer Brands position
In addition to having Designer Brands in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Sovereign ETFs Thematic Idea Now
Sovereign ETFs
ETF themes focus on helping investors to gain exposure to a broad range of assets, diversify, and lower overall costs. The Sovereign ETFs theme has 17 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Sovereign ETFs Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Check out Investing Opportunities. For more detail on how to invest in Designer Stock please use our How to Invest in Designer Brands guide.You can also try the Sectors module to list of equity sectors categorizing publicly traded companies based on their primary business activities.
To fully project Designer Brands' future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of Designer Brands at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Designer Brands' income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.