Maple Leaf Gross Profit vs. Net Income

MGWFF Stock  USD 0.02  0.0001  0.42%   
Considering the key profitability indicators obtained from Maple Leaf's historical financial statements, Maple Leaf Green may not be well positioned to generate adequate gross income at this time. It has a very high probability of underperforming in January. Profitability indicators assess Maple Leaf's ability to earn profits and add value for shareholders.
For Maple Leaf profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Maple Leaf to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Maple Leaf Green utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Maple Leaf's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Maple Leaf Green over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
  
Check out Correlation Analysis.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Maple Leaf's value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine if Maple Leaf is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Maple Leaf's price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.

Maple Leaf Green Net Income vs. Gross Profit Fundamental Analysis

Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Maple Leaf's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Maple Leaf value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth.
Maple Leaf Green is considered to be number one stock in gross profit category among its peers. It also is considered to be number one stock in net income category among its peers . The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the Maple Leaf's earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.

Maple Net Income vs. Gross Profit

Gross Profit is the most basic measure of business operational efficiency. It is simply the difference between sales revenue and the cost associated with making a product or providing a service. It is calculated before deducting administrative expenses, taxes, and interest payments.

Maple Leaf

Gross Profit

 = 

Revenue

-

Cost of Revenue

 = 
1.1 M
Gross Profit varies significantly from one sector to another and tells an investor how much money a business would have made if it didn't have to pay any overhead expenses such as salary, taxes, or rent.
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.

Maple Leaf

Net Income

 = 

(Rev + Gain)

-

(Exp + Loss)

 = 
(2.54 M)
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.

Maple Net Income Comparison

Maple Leaf is currently under evaluation in net income category among its peers.

Maple Leaf Profitability Projections

The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Maple Leaf, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Maple Leaf will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Maple Leaf's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Maple Leaf, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
Maple Leaf Green World Inc. focuses on the health and wellness industry in North America and China. Maple Leaf Green World Inc. is headquartered in Calgary, Canada. Maple Leaf is traded on OTC Exchange in the United States.

Maple Profitability Driver Comparison

Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Maple Leaf. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Maple Leaf position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Maple Leaf's important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.

Use Maple Leaf in pair-trading

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Maple Leaf position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Maple Leaf will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.

Maple Leaf Pair Trading

Maple Leaf Green Pair Trading Analysis

The ability to find closely correlated positions to Maple Leaf could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Maple Leaf when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Maple Leaf - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Maple Leaf Green to buy it.
The correlation of Maple Leaf is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Maple Leaf moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Maple Leaf Green moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Maple Leaf can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching

Use Investing Themes to Complement your Maple Leaf position

In addition to having Maple Leaf in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.

Did You Try This Idea?

Run Broad Sovereign ETFs Thematic Idea Now

Broad Sovereign ETFs
Broad Sovereign ETFs Theme
ETF themes focus on helping investors to gain exposure to a broad range of assets, diversify, and lower overall costs. The Broad Sovereign ETFs theme has 14 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Broad Sovereign ETFs Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
View All  Next Launch

Other Information on Investing in Maple Pink Sheet

To fully project Maple Leaf's future profitability, investors should examine all historical financial statements. These statements provide investors with a comprehensive snapshot of the financial position of Maple Leaf Green at a specified time, usually calculated after every quarter, six months, or one year. Three primary documents fall into the category of financial statements. These documents include Maple Leaf's income statement, its balance sheet, and the statement of cash flows.
Potential Maple Leaf investors and stakeholders can use historical trends found within financial statements to determine how well the company is positioned for the future. Although Maple Leaf investors may work on each financial statement separately, they are all related. The changes in Maple Leaf's assets and liabilities, for example, are also reflected in the revenues and expenses that we see on Maple Leaf's income statement, which results in the company's gains or losses. Cash flows can provide more information regarding cash listed on a balance sheet but not equivalent to net income shown on the income statement. Please read more on our technical analysis and fundamental analysis pages.