Rural Funds Gross Profit vs. EBITDA
| RFF Stock | 1.77 0.02 1.14% |
Gross Profit | First Reported 2012-12-31 | Previous Quarter 34 M | Current Value 38.3 M | Quarterly Volatility 11.1 M |
For Rural Funds profitability analysis, we use financial ratios and fundamental drivers that measure the ability of Rural Funds to generate income relative to revenue, assets, operating costs, and current equity. These fundamental indicators attest to how well Rural Funds Group utilizes its assets to generate profit and value for its shareholders. The profitability module also shows relationships between Rural Funds's most relevant fundamental drivers. It provides multiple suggestions of what could affect the performance of Rural Funds Group over time as well as its relative position and ranking within its peers.
Rural |
Rural Funds Group EBITDA vs. Gross Profit Fundamental Analysis
Comparative valuation techniques use various fundamental indicators to help in determining Rural Funds's current stock value. Our valuation model uses many indicators to compare Rural Funds value to that of its competitors to determine the firm's financial worth. Rural Funds Group is currently regarded as top stock in gross profit category among its peers. It also is currently regarded as top stock in ebitda category among its peers totaling about 0.79 of EBITDA per Gross Profit. The ratio of Gross Profit to EBITDA for Rural Funds Group is roughly 1.26 . At this time, Rural Funds' Gross Profit is comparatively stable compared to the past year. The reason why the comparable model can be used in almost all circumstances is due to the vast number of multiples that can be utilized, such as the price-to-earnings (P/E), price-to-book (P/B), price-to-sales (P/S), price-to-cash flow (P/CF), and many others. The P/E ratio is the most commonly used of these ratios because it focuses on the Rural Funds' earnings, one of the primary drivers of an investment's value.Rural EBITDA vs. Gross Profit
Gross Profit is the most basic measure of business operational efficiency. It is simply the difference between sales revenue and the cost associated with making a product or providing a service. It is calculated before deducting administrative expenses, taxes, and interest payments.
Rural Funds |
| = | 67.82 M |
Gross Profit varies significantly from one sector to another and tells an investor how much money a business would have made if it didn't have to pay any overhead expenses such as salary, taxes, or rent.
EBITDA stands for earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. It is a measure of a company operating cash flow based on data from the company income statement and is a very good way to compare companies within industries or across different sectors. However, unlike Operating Cash Flow, EBITDA does not include the effects of changes in working capital.
Rural Funds |
| = | 53.91 M |
In a nutshell, EBITDA is calculated by adding back each of the excluded items to the post-tax profit, and can be used to compare companies with very different capital structures.
Rural EBITDA Comparison
Rural Funds is currently under evaluation in ebitda category among its peers.
Rural Funds Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Rural Funds, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Rural Funds will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Rural Funds' change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Rural Funds, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | 107 M | 112.3 M | |
| Operating Income | 112.5 M | 118.1 M | |
| Income Before Tax | 81.6 M | 55.1 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | 1.1 M | 2.1 M | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -30.9 M | -29.4 M | |
| Net Income | 80.4 M | 63.7 M | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 108.7 M | 65.8 M | |
| Interest Income | 14.7 M | 15.4 M | |
| Net Interest Income | -5.9 M | -6.2 M | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 80.4 M | 85.4 M | |
| Change To Netincome | -83.4 M | -79.2 M |
Rural Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers are factors that can directly affect your investment outlook on Rural Funds. Investors often realize that things won't turn out the way they predict. There are maybe way too many unforeseen events and contingencies during the holding period of Rural Funds position where the market behavior may be hard to predict, tax policy changes, gold or oil price hikes, calamities change, and many others. The question is, are you prepared for these unexpected events? Although some of these situations are obviously beyond your control, you can still follow the important profit indicators to know where you should focus on when things like this occur. Below are some of the Rural Funds' important profitability drivers and their relationship over time.
Use Rural Funds in pair-trading
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Rural Funds position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Rural Funds will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Rural Funds Pair Trading
Rural Funds Group Pair Trading Analysis
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Rural Funds could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Rural Funds when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Rural Funds - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Rural Funds Group to buy it.
The correlation of Rural Funds is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Rural Funds moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Rural Funds Group moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Rural Funds can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Rural Funds position
In addition to having Rural Funds in your portfolios, you can quickly add positions using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your very unique investing style. A single investing idea is a collection of funds, stocks, ETFs, or cryptocurrencies that are programmatically selected from a pull of investment themes. After you determine your investment opportunity, you can then find an optimal portfolio that will maximize potential returns on the chosen idea or minimize its exposure to market volatility.Did You Try This Idea?
Run Beer and Liquor Thematic Idea Now
Beer and Liquor
Fama and French investing themes focus on testing asset pricing under different economic assumptions. The Beer and Liquor theme has 32 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Beer and Liquor Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Additional Tools for Rural Stock Analysis
When running Rural Funds' price analysis, check to measure Rural Funds' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Rural Funds is operating at the current time. Most of Rural Funds' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Rural Funds' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Rural Funds' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Rural Funds to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.