Churchill Downs (Germany) Insiders
| CHR Stock | 133.00 3.00 2.21% |
Churchill Downs employs about 5.5 K people. The company is managed by 10 executives with a total tenure of roughly 12834 years, averaging almost 1283.0 years of service per executive, having 550.0 employees per reported executive. Breaking down Churchill Downs' management performance can provide insight into the firm performance.
| Nate Simon Insider VP CTO |
| Nick Zangari Insider Investor Treasury |
Churchill |
Churchill Downs Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0547 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0547 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 1.0239 %, meaning that it generated $1.0239 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Churchill Downs' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Churchill Downs manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.Churchill Downs Workforce Comparison
Churchill Downs Incorporated is number one stock in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Gambling industry is currently estimated at about 32,192. Churchill Downs retains roughly 5,500 in number of employees claiming about 17% of equities under Gambling industry.
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 0.24 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.22 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.22. Churchill Downs Benchmark Summation
Operator |
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Churchill Downs Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Churchill Downs price series and its benchmark/peer.
Churchill Downs Notable Stakeholders
A Churchill Downs stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Churchill Downs often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Churchill Downs' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Churchill Downs' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
| Nate Simon | VP CTO | Profile | |
| Nick Zangari | Investor Treasury | Profile | |
| Michael Anderson | VP Racetrack | Profile | |
| William Mudd | Pres COO | Profile | |
| Katherine Armstrong | VP HR | Profile | |
| Marcia CPA | Ex CFO | Profile | |
| Jason Sauer | Sr Devel | Profile | |
| William Carstanjen | CEO Director | Profile | |
| Chad Dobson | Chief VP | Profile | |
| Bradley Blackwell | Gen VP | Profile |
About Churchill Downs Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Churchill Downs often depends on how effective the management is. Churchill Downs management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Churchill management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Churchill management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Churchill Downs' accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Churchill Downs Incorporated. Check Churchill Downs' Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Churchill Downs' management manipulating its earnings.
Churchill Downs Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Churchill Downs use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Churchill Downs within its industry.Churchill Downs Manpower Efficiency
Return on Churchill Downs Manpower
| Revenue Per Employee | 329.1K | |
| Revenue Per Executive | 181M | |
| Net Income Per Employee | 79.9K | |
| Net Income Per Executive | 43.9M |
Additional Tools for Churchill Stock Analysis
When running Churchill Downs' price analysis, check to measure Churchill Downs' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Churchill Downs is operating at the current time. Most of Churchill Downs' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Churchill Downs' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Churchill Downs' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Churchill Downs to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.