Intrusion Company Insiders
INTZ Stock | USD 0.40 0.00 0.000002% |
Intrusion's insiders are aggressively buying. The analysis of insider sentiment suggests that vertually all Intrusion insiders are, at present, extremely bullish. Intrusion employs about 50 people. The company is managed by 10 executives with a total tenure of roughly 21 years, averaging almost 2.0 years of service per executive, having 5.0 employees per reported executive.
Joe Head Chairman Co-Founder, Vice Chairman and VP |
Intrusion's Insider Buying Vs Selling
100
Selling | Buying |
Latest Trades
2024-04-22 | Kimberly Pinson | Acquired 10000 @ 1.7 | View |
Monitoring Intrusion's insider sentiment can offer insights into its future performance, as insiders often have access to more information about their company's operations, financial health, and upcoming initiatives than the general public. However, it's essential to note that insider trading is regulated by securities laws, and insiders are required to disclose their trades publicly to ensure transparency and prevent unfair advantages based on non-public information.
Intrusion |
Intrusion Management Team Effectiveness
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of (0.9859) % which means that it has lost $0.9859 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of (4.7742) %, meaning that it created substantial loss on money invested by shareholders. Intrusion's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Intrusion manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. At this time, Intrusion's Return On Capital Employed is fairly stable compared to the past year. Return On Equity is likely to rise to 1.53 in 2024, despite the fact that Return On Tangible Assets are likely to grow to (2.11). At this time, Intrusion's Intangible Assets are fairly stable compared to the past year. Intangibles To Total Assets is likely to rise to 0.11 in 2024, whereas Total Assets are likely to drop slightly above 5.9 M in 2024.Common Stock Shares Outstanding is likely to drop to about 1.2 M in 2024. Net Loss is likely to rise to about (13.9 M) in 2024
Intrusion Workforce Comparison
Intrusion is rated below average in number of employees category among its peers. The total workforce of Information Technology industry is currently estimated at about 12,163. Intrusion adds roughly 50.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of equities under Information Technology industry.
Intrusion Profit Margins
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of (1.81) %, which may suggest that it does not properly executes on its current pricing strategies or is unable to control all of the operational costs. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of (1.39) %, which suggests for every $100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating loss of $1.39.Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross Profit Margin | 0.43 | 0.776 |
|
|
Intrusion Insider Trading
Some recent studies suggest that insider trading raises the cost of capital for securities issuers and decreases overall economic growth. Trading by specific Intrusion insiders, such as employees or executives, is commonly permitted as long as it does not rely on Intrusion's material information that is not in the public domain. Local jurisdictions usually require such trading to be reported in order to monitor insider transactions. In many U.S. states, trading conducted by corporate officers, key employees, directors, or significant shareholders must be reported to the regulator or publicly disclosed, usually within a few business days of the trade. In these cases, Intrusion insiders must file a Form 4 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) when buying or selling shares of their own companies.
Byrd Benjamin Franklin a day ago Acquisition by Byrd Benjamin Franklin of 25974 shares of Intrusion at 3.85 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Levecchio Anthony J over a week ago Acquisition by Levecchio Anthony J of 26316 shares of Intrusion at 2.66 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Duzich Christopher James over a month ago Insider Trading | ||
Levecchio Anthony J over two months ago Acquisition by Levecchio Anthony J of 166666 shares of Intrusion at 0.6 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Wilson Gregory K. over three months ago Acquisition by Wilson Gregory K. of 50724 shares of Intrusion at 1.38 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Gero James over three months ago Acquisition by Gero James of 50724 shares of Intrusion at 1.38 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Mccallum Katrinka over three months ago Acquisition by Mccallum Katrinka of 50724 shares of Intrusion at 1.38 subject to Rule 16b-3 | ||
Ross Mandel over three months ago Acquisition by Ross Mandel of 566 shares of Intrusion at 1.21 subject to Rule 16b-3 |
Intrusion Notable Stakeholders
An Intrusion stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Intrusion often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Intrusion's stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Intrusion's stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.
Anthony Scott | CEO President | Profile | |
Joe Head | Co-Founder, Vice Chairman and VP | Profile | |
Andrew Wildrix | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Ross Mandel | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Esq CPA | Ex Chairman | Profile | |
Paul Little | Senior Resources | Profile | |
Doug Haloftis | General Secretary | Profile | |
Christopher CPA | Chief Officer | Profile | |
Josh Carroll | Investor Officer | Profile | |
Kimberly Pinson | Principal CFO | Profile |
About Intrusion Management Performance
The success or failure of an entity such as Intrusion often depends on how effective the management is. Intrusion management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Intrusion management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Intrusion management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
Return On Tangible Assets | (2.22) | (2.11) | |
Return On Capital Employed | 1.50 | 2.16 | |
Return On Assets | (2.22) | (2.11) | |
Return On Equity | 1.45 | 1.53 |
Please note, the imprecision that can be found in Intrusion's accounting process means that the reasonable investor should take a skeptical approach toward the financial statement analysis of Intrusion. Check Intrusion's Beneish M Score to see the likelihood of Intrusion's management manipulating its earnings.
Intrusion Workforce Analysis
Traditionally, organizations such as Intrusion use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Intrusion within its industry.Intrusion Manpower Efficiency
Return on Intrusion Manpower
Revenue Per Employee | 112.2K | |
Revenue Per Executive | 561.1K | |
Net Loss Per Employee | 277.8K | |
Net Loss Per Executive | 1.4M |
Additional Tools for Intrusion Stock Analysis
When running Intrusion's price analysis, check to measure Intrusion's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Intrusion is operating at the current time. Most of Intrusion's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Intrusion's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Intrusion's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Intrusion to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.