Scientific Games (Germany) Top Insiders

TJW Stock  EUR 91.00  1.00  1.09%   
Scientific Games employs about 5.6 K people. The company is managed by 10 executives with a total tenure of roughly 13067 years, averaging almost 1306.0 years of service per executive, having 560.0 employees per reported executive. Examination of Scientific Games' management performance can provide insight into the company performance.
Stephen Richardson  Insider
Chief VP
James Bombassei  Insider
VP Relations
  
Check out World Market Map to better understand how to build diversified portfolios, which includes a position in Scientific Games. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in board of governors.

Scientific Games Management Team Effectiveness

The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.0316 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.0316 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Scientific Games' management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Scientific Games manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities.
The company has Profit Margin (PM) of 1.55 %, which maeans that even a very small decline in it revenue will erase profits resulting in a net loss. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows Operating Margin (OM) of 0.15 %, which suggests for every 100 dollars of sales, it generated a net operating income of $0.15.

Scientific Games Benchmark Summation

Operator
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. Scientific Games Price Series Summation is a cross summation of Scientific Games price series and its benchmark/peer.

Scientific Games Notable Stakeholders

A Scientific Games stakeholder refers to an individual interested in an outcome of the business. Different stakeholders have different interests, and companies such as Scientific Games often face trade-offs trying to please all of them. Scientific Games' stakeholders can have a positive or negative influence on the entity's direction, and there are a lot of executives involved in getting Scientific Games' stock to the level that pleases all shareholders. Keeping track of the stakeholders is a great way to stay on top of things affecting its ongoing price.

About Scientific Games Management Performance

The success or failure of an entity such as Scientific Games often depends on how effective the management is. Scientific Games management team is responsible for propelling the future growth in the right direction and administering and controlling the business activities and accounting for the results. Ineffective management usually contributes to failure in the company's future performance for all stakeholders equally, but most importantly, for investors. So it is important to measure the effectiveness of Scientific management before purchasing its stock. In many ways, it's all about finding the answer to one important question - Are they doing the right thing right now? How would we assess whether the Scientific management is utilizing all available resources in the best possible way? Also, how well is the company doing relative to others in its sector and the market as a whole? The answer can be found by analyzing a few important fundamental indicators such as return on assets and return on equity.
Scientific Games Corporation develops technology-based products and services, and related content for the gaming, lottery, and digital gaming industries worldwide. The company was founded in 1984 and is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada. SCIENT GAMES operates under Gambling classification in Germany and is traded on Frankfurt Stock Exchange. It employs 9700 people.

Scientific Games Workforce Analysis

Traditionally, organizations such as Scientific Games use manpower efficiency calculations for various incentive schemes, employee appraisal, or as an initiative to improve the processes. However, it can also be used by investors to make long-term investment decisions. The trends in the profit per employee or revenue per employee are measured by net income or revenue divided by the current number of full-time employees over a given time interval. Because workforce needs differ across sectors, these ratios could be used to compare Scientific Games within its industry.

Scientific Games Manpower Efficiency

Return on Scientific Games Manpower

Revenue Per Employee384.5K
Revenue Per Executive215.3M
Net Income Per Employee66.2K
Net Income Per Executive37.1M

Complementary Tools for Scientific Stock analysis

When running Scientific Games' price analysis, check to measure Scientific Games' market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Scientific Games is operating at the current time. Most of Scientific Games' value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Scientific Games' future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Scientific Games' price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Scientific Games to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.
Price Transformation
Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
ETF Categories
List of ETF categories grouped based on various criteria, such as the investment strategy or type of investments