Andrew Peller Current Debt

ADW-A Stock  CAD 4.01  0.01  0.25%   
Andrew Peller Limited holds a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.714. At this time, Andrew Peller's Short and Long Term Debt Total is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Net Debt is likely to gain to about 237.8 M in 2024, whereas Short and Long Term Debt is likely to drop slightly above 189.1 K in 2024. . Andrew Peller's financial risk is the risk to Andrew Peller stockholders that is caused by an increase in debt.

Asset vs Debt

Equity vs Debt

Andrew Peller's liquidity is one of the most fundamental aspects of both its future profitability and its ability to meet different types of ongoing financial obligations. Andrew Peller's cash, liquid assets, total liabilities, and shareholder equity can be utilized to evaluate how much leverage the Company is using to sustain its current operations. For traders, higher-leverage indicators usually imply a higher risk to shareholders. In addition, it helps Andrew Stock's retail investors understand whether an upcoming fall or rise in the market will negatively affect Andrew Peller's stakeholders.
For most companies, including Andrew Peller, marketable securities, inventories, and receivables are the most common assets that could be converted to cash. However, for Andrew Peller Limited, the most critical issue when managing liquidity is ensuring that current assets are properly aligned with current liabilities. If they are not, Andrew Peller's management will need to obtain alternative financing to ensure there are always enough cash equivalents on the balance sheet to meet obligations.
Price Book
0.72
Book Value
5.569
Operating Margin
0.1106
Profit Margin
(0.01)
Return On Assets
0.0229
At this time, Andrew Peller's Total Current Liabilities is comparatively stable compared to the past year. Non Current Liabilities Total is likely to gain to about 265.7 M in 2024, whereas Liabilities And Stockholders Equity is likely to drop slightly above 289 M in 2024.
  
Check out the analysis of Andrew Peller Fundamentals Over Time.

Andrew Peller Limited Debt to Cash Allocation

Andrew Peller Limited has accumulated 226.51 M in total debt with debt to equity ratio (D/E) of 0.71, which is about average as compared to similar companies. Andrew Peller Limited has a current ratio of 1.71, which is within standard range for the sector. Debt can assist Andrew Peller until it has trouble settling it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. So, Andrew Peller's shareholders could walk away with nothing if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt. However, a more frequent occurrence is when companies like Andrew Peller Limited sell additional shares at bargain prices, diluting existing shareholders. Debt, in this case, can be an excellent and much better tool for Andrew to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we think about Andrew Peller's use of debt, we should always consider it together with cash and equity.

Andrew Peller Total Assets Over Time

Andrew Peller Assets Financed by Debt

The debt-to-assets ratio shows the degree to which Andrew Peller uses debt to finance its assets. It includes both long-term and short-term borrowings maturing within one year. It also includes both tangible and intangible assets, such as goodwill.

Andrew Peller Debt Ratio

    
  25.0   
It appears most of the Andrew Peller's assets are financed through equity. Typically, companies with high debt-to-asset ratios are said to be highly leveraged. The higher the ratio, the greater risk will be associated with the Andrew Peller's operation. In addition, a high debt-to-assets ratio may indicate a low borrowing capacity of Andrew Peller, which in turn will lower the firm's financial flexibility.

Andrew Short Long Term Debt Total

Short Long Term Debt Total

237.84 Million

At this time, Andrew Peller's Short and Long Term Debt Total is comparatively stable compared to the past year.

Understaning Andrew Peller Use of Financial Leverage

Andrew Peller's financial leverage ratio measures its total debt position, including all of its outstanding liabilities, and compares it to Andrew Peller's current equity. If creditors own a majority of Andrew Peller's assets, the company is considered highly leveraged. Understanding the composition and structure of Andrew Peller's outstanding bonds gives an idea of how risky it is and if it is worth investing in.
Last ReportedProjected for Next Year
Short and Long Term Debt Total226.5 M237.8 M
Net Debt226.5 M237.8 M
Short Term Debt5.6 M5.3 M
Long Term Debt208.3 M129 M
Short and Long Term Debt199 K189.1 K
Net Debt To EBITDA 6.14  6.45 
Debt To Equity 0.86  0.54 
Interest Debt Per Share 6.11  6.42 
Debt To Assets 0.38  0.25 
Long Term Debt To Capitalization 0.46  0.49 
Total Debt To Capitalization 0.46  0.30 
Debt Equity Ratio 0.86  0.54 
Debt Ratio 0.38  0.25 
Cash Flow To Debt Ratio 0.18  0.17 
Please read more on our technical analysis page.

Pair Trading with Andrew Peller

One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Andrew Peller position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Andrew Peller will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Andrew Peller could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Andrew Peller when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Andrew Peller - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Andrew Peller Limited to buy it.
The correlation of Andrew Peller is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Andrew Peller moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Andrew Peller Limited moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Andrew Peller can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Pair CorrelationCorrelation Matching

Additional Tools for Andrew Stock Analysis

When running Andrew Peller's price analysis, check to measure Andrew Peller's market volatility, profitability, liquidity, solvency, efficiency, growth potential, financial leverage, and other vital indicators. We have many different tools that can be utilized to determine how healthy Andrew Peller is operating at the current time. Most of Andrew Peller's value examination focuses on studying past and present price action to predict the probability of Andrew Peller's future price movements. You can analyze the entity against its peers and the financial market as a whole to determine factors that move Andrew Peller's price. Additionally, you may evaluate how the addition of Andrew Peller to your portfolios can decrease your overall portfolio volatility.

What is Financial Leverage?

Financial leverage is the use of borrowed money (debt) to finance the purchase of assets with the expectation that the income or capital gain from the new asset will exceed the cost of borrowing. In most cases, the debt provider will limit how much risk it is ready to take and indicate a limit on the extent of the leverage it will allow. In the case of asset-backed lending, the financial provider uses the assets as collateral until the borrower repays the loan. In the case of a cash flow loan, the general creditworthiness of the company is used to back the loan. The concept of leverage is common in the business world. It is mostly used to boost the returns on equity capital of a company, especially when the business is unable to increase its operating efficiency and returns on total investment. Because earnings on borrowing are higher than the interest payable on debt, the company's total earnings will increase, ultimately boosting stockholders' profits.

Leverage and Capital Costs

The debt to equity ratio plays a role in the working average cost of capital (WACC). The overall interest on debt represents the break-even point that must be obtained to profitability in a given venture. Thus, WACC is essentially the average interest an organization owes on the capital it has borrowed for leverage. Let's say equity represents 60% of borrowed capital, and debt is 40%. This results in a financial leverage calculation of 40/60, or 0.6667. The organization owes 10% on all equity and 5% on all debt. That means that the weighted average cost of capital is (.4)(5) + (.6)(10) - or 8%. For every $10,000 borrowed, this organization will owe $800 in interest. Profit must be higher than 8% on the project to offset the cost of interest and justify this leverage.

Benefits of Financial Leverage

Leverage provides the following benefits for companies:
  • Leverage is an essential tool a company's management can use to make the best financing and investment decisions.
  • It provides a variety of financing sources by which the firm can achieve its target earnings.
  • Leverage is also an essential technique in investing as it helps companies set a threshold for the expansion of business operations. For example, it can be used to recommend restrictions on business expansion once the projected return on additional investment is lower than the cost of debt.
By borrowing funds, the firm incurs a debt that must be paid. But, this debt is paid in small installments over a relatively long period of time. This frees funds for more immediate use in the stock market. For example, suppose a company can afford a new factory but will be left with negligible free cash. In that case, it may be better to finance the factory and spend the cash on hand on inputs, labor, or even hold a significant portion as a reserve against unforeseen circumstances.

The Risk of Financial Leverage

The most obvious and apparent risk of leverage is that if price changes unexpectedly, the leveraged position can lead to severe losses. For example, imagine a hedge fund seeded by $50 worth of investor money. The hedge fund borrows another $50 and buys an asset worth $100, leading to a leverage ratio of 2:1. For the investor, this is neither good nor bad -- until the asset price changes. If the asset price goes up 10 percent, the investor earns $10 on $50 of capital, a net gain of 20 percent, and is very pleased with the increased gains from the leverage. However, if the asset price crashes unexpectedly, say by 30 percent, the investor loses $30 on $50 of capital, suffering a 60 percent loss. In other words, the effect of leverage is to increase the volatility of returns and increase the effects of a price change on the asset to the bottom line while increasing the chance for profit as well.