Judith Athaide - Computer Modelling Independent Director
| CMG Stock | CAD 11.14 0.88 8.58% |
Director
Ms. Judith J. Athaide serves as Independent Director of the company since July 13, 2017. Ms. Athaide is the President and Chief Executive Officer of The Cogent Group Inc., an independent energy consulting firm, which she cofounded in 1999. Ms. Athaide is the Past Chair of the Calgary Chapter of the Institute of Corporationrationrate Directors and is currently serving on the Board of Governors of the Calgary Petroleum Club. She has served as a Director of PHX Energy Services Corporationration since May 2009, New Brunswick Power Corporation since May 2014 and HSBC Bank Canada since May 2017. Ms. Athaide served as a Director of The Balancing Pool from December 2011 to October 2015, Fortis Alberta Inc. from April 2008 to April 2014, Cimarron Engineering from June 2009 to 2012 and Cognera Corporationration from March 2006 to 2012. Ms. Athaide is a professional engineer with more than 25 years of experience in the energy industry and has extensive experience in matters of strategy creation and implementation, acquisition and divestiture valuation and negotiation, opportunity assessments, business development, marketing and trading, and project management. She also has experience serving in a wide range of forprofit and notforprofit governance roles. Ms. Athaide holds a BS degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Alberta, a MBA in Finance from the University of Alberta and a B.Comm from the University of Manitoba. Ms. Athaide was awarded the designation of ICD.D by the Institute of Corporationrationrate Directors. She is also a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta since 2017.
| Age | 56 |
| Tenure | 7 years |
| Address | 3710 33 Street NW, Calgary, AB, Canada, T2L 2M1 |
| Phone | 403 531 1300 |
| Web | https://www.cmgl.ca |
Computer Modelling Management Efficiency
The company has return on total asset (ROA) of 0.1279 % which means that it generated a profit of $0.1279 on every $100 spent on assets. This is way below average. Similarly, it shows a return on equity (ROE) of 0.3656 %, meaning that it generated $0.3656 on every $100 dollars invested by stockholders. Computer Modelling's management efficiency ratios could be used to measure how well Computer Modelling manages its routine affairs as well as how well it operates its assets and liabilities. As of the 3rd of December 2024, Return On Tangible Assets is likely to drop to 0.14. In addition to that, Return On Capital Employed is likely to drop to 0.31. At this time, Computer Modelling's Asset Turnover is very stable compared to the past year.Similar Executives
| Showing other executives | DIRECTOR Age | ||
| Rakesh Patel | Evertz Technologies Limited | 52 | |
| Helen Wesley | Enerflex | 49 | |
| Judi Hess | Pason Systems | 59 | |
| Ian McWalter | Evertz Technologies Limited | 58 | |
| Jamie Plosz | Enerflex | N/A | |
| Diane MacDiarmid | Altus Group Limited | 63 | |
| Kevin Reinhart | Enerflex | 60 | |
| Michael Weill | Enerflex | 61 | |
| Maureen Jackson | Enerflex | 61 | |
| Angela Brown | Altus Group Limited | 61 | |
| James Howe | Pason Systems | 68 | |
| Thomas Pistor | Evertz Technologies Limited | N/A | |
| Brian Piccioni | Evertz Technologies Limited | N/A | |
| Martin Miasko | Altus Group Limited | N/A | |
| Janet Woodruff | Altus Group Limited | 62 | |
| William Dunn | Enerflex | 65 | |
| Robert Boswell | Enerflex | 69 | |
| Anthony Gaffney | Altus Group Limited | 61 | |
| Christopher Colclough | Evertz Technologies Limited | N/A | |
Management Performance
| Return On Equity | 0.37 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.13 |
Computer Modelling Leadership Team
Elected by the shareholders, the Computer Modelling's board of directors comprises two types of representatives: Computer Modelling inside directors who are chosen from within the company, and outside directors, selected externally and held independent of Computer. The board's role is to monitor Computer Modelling's management team and ensure that shareholders' interests are well served. Computer Modelling's inside directors are responsible for reviewing and approving budgets prepared by upper management to implement core corporate initiatives and projects. On the other hand, Computer Modelling's outside directors are responsible for providing unbiased perspectives on the board's policies.
| Pramod Jain, CEO President | ||
| Kristina Mysev, Head Culture | ||
| Robert Smith, Independent Director | ||
| Krisztina MBA, Head Marketing | ||
| James Erdle, Vice President, USA and Latin America | ||
| Sheldon Harbinson, Head Operations | ||
| John Eng, Chief Officer | ||
| Mohammad Khalaf, Head Development | ||
| Sandra Balic, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President - Finance | ||
| Christopher Fong, Independent Director | ||
| Kenneth Dedeluk, CEO and President and Director | ||
| Rahul Jain, Head Operations | ||
| Ryan Schneider, President, Chief Executive Officer, Director | ||
| Patrick Jamieson, Independent Director | ||
| Judith Athaide, Independent Director | ||
| Kristin Mason, Manager Compliance | ||
| John Zaozirny, Independent Chairman of the Board | ||
| Mark Miller, Independent Director | ||
| Jason Close, Vice President CoFlow Commercialization | ||
| Kathy Krug, Corporate Secretary | ||
| Anjani Kumar, Vice President - Engineering Solutions and Marketing | ||
| Daniel Edelshaim, Head Legal | ||
| Peter Kinash, Independent Director | ||
| Kirsten Sklar, Corporate Secretary | ||
| Long Nghiem, Chief Technology Officer, Vice President - Research and Development | ||
| R Hicks, Vice President Eastern Hemisphere | ||
| Dave Montana, Vice Sales | ||
| Kelly Tomyn, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Vice President - Finance |
Computer Stock Performance Indicators
The ability to make a profit is the ultimate goal of any investor. But to identify the right stock is not an easy task. Is Computer Modelling a good investment? Although profit is still the single most important financial element of any organization, multiple performance indicators can help investors identify the equity that they will appreciate over time.
| Return On Equity | 0.37 | ||||
| Return On Asset | 0.13 | ||||
| Profit Margin | 0.20 % | ||||
| Operating Margin | 0.19 % | ||||
| Current Valuation | 889.33 M | ||||
| Shares Outstanding | 81.95 M | ||||
| Shares Owned By Insiders | 1.03 % | ||||
| Shares Owned By Institutions | 52.86 % | ||||
| Number Of Shares Shorted | 1.08 M | ||||
| Price To Earning | 17.37 X |
Pair Trading with Computer Modelling
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Computer Modelling position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Computer Modelling will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.Moving together with Computer Stock
Moving against Computer Stock
The ability to find closely correlated positions to Computer Modelling could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Computer Modelling when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Computer Modelling - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Computer Modelling Group to buy it.
The correlation of Computer Modelling is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Computer Modelling moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Computer Modelling moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Computer Modelling can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.Other Information on Investing in Computer Stock
Computer Modelling financial ratios help investors to determine whether Computer Stock is cheap or expensive when compared to a particular measure, such as profits or enterprise value. In other words, they help investors to determine the cost of investment in Computer with respect to the benefits of owning Computer Modelling security.